No. Normally the kernel doesn't get updated in the network during training. They are called hyper-parameters. They do affect training, but they are not updated by the training algorithm
bitfucker
joined 1 year ago
In the context of machine learning, usually a list of numbers that is arranged in a certain way, and is used for mathematical operation. You can think of it as a transfer/transform "function" that takes data as input, and spits out the representation of said data in some other way (that we usually don't know until the training is finished and we analyze the result)
Yeah, the difference is that this time an expert uses the tools as it should be. Not regular Joe feeding all the code with a prompt to "find a vulnerability". Even then, this is a coincidence. But this discovery means there exists (maybe) a strategy that can be tried to detect similar exploits.
For the kind of supported data, one looks at the README and it supports a lot of different kinds of metadata, hence the generic description. A jpeg (or other image) metadata editor cannot edit metadata for geospatial surveys for example. But this application can. And manage it like any other CRUD application works. By providing users a way to enter a new entry, edit it, remove it, query it, all kinds of things really.
Tl;dr, the tool is called Metadata Editor and released under MIT. As the name suggests, it helps manage metadata for data. Currently supported standard includes:
IPTC
ISO 19139
Dublin Core
DDI-CodeBook v2.5
Isn't it fall to the OEM that specifically uses google technology to disable it if they want people to use their version? Android can be used without google after all.
I don't understand. What do you mean by deciding what the code should do in the context of language design? Can you give a concrete example? I am confused because the "main" function is required when you make an executable. Otherwise, a library will not contain any main function and we could compile it just fine no? (Shared library)
What is not hacky then in a language design?
That's... what I'm saying. Clean room implementation is legal. You accidentally arrive at the same conclusion independently. And yes, it is tedious to do it but it is legal.
How so? People come up with the same idea all the time independently of each other. When doing clean room implementation (the ideal best case), you are not liable if what you create at the end matches 1-1 with the original. You never know anything about the implementation detail of the original. Academia also acknowledged independent discovery and publication of many things. Why would clean room implementation be different?
Pick a hardware to tinker with. I'd suggest a development kit rather than some cheap mcu-psu-downloader-only board. Now listen, it may be more on the expensive side, but you don't have to deal with hardware trouble first since many development board usually provide a lot of functionality to play with.
Second, check the official documentation for said devkit and play with it. You'll ended up immersing yourself on your selected manufacturer but that's fine for learning.
After you've more understanding of the workflow for embedded development, then I can safely advice you to start exploring. A simple one would be programming the same board but using a different workflow. You may ended up with the manufacturer IDE, and wondering how to get to your beloved editor for example. Then you start to learn the build workflow until download and debug step.