In conclusion, there are two terrorist groups fighting, and the civilians of both groups are suffering for it.
azulavoir
joined 2 years ago
Every vote or lack thereof is a vote for genocide. There isn't really a way to vote against it.
I'd rather vote for the party that's 85% nazi than 100%. And in a world where it's entirely unrealistic that anyone else can win between past-the-post voting and voter disenfranchisement, that's the best we're getting.
One clear and dry example of this that comes to mind is that Code Bullet got banned from JStris(or some other online tetris server?) because he was botting and not in their dedicated bot queue
My stab in the dark is 8. That feels about right
It's pretty effective when your attacker doesn't want to harm innocents at any cost, at least. But most organizations going to war don't care enough.
If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I'd rather do that than indiscriminate fire.
Yes, because that's exactly what the thread is about. Making assumptions about control flow.
Since Jimmy Carter, I'd imagine
For a single-issue anti-genocide voter, the US is a duopoly of bad choices. For most anyone else, absolutely correct.