astropenguin5

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

I read the description :3

also 🥺

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Exactly. When discord updated their mobile UI everyone immediately hated it cuz different. There were legitimately some poor decisions made, but then they went and reverted like half of it after people had started to get used to it. For example, I got used to and liked where they moved dms to and they reverted it back, but kept having to tap on the name of a channel to view the users in it instead of just swiping left.

Edit: and I'm also now used to the bad things they kept.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I don't actually know but it is fairly likely that the definition of 'man' in the law is defined as any person. It is that way in the US at least, though most new laws and such use person there are quite a few old laws that use such wording to describe any person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm pretty sure its the usage of "me think", which is not standard English (although methinks together is more acceptable interestingly), as well as the use of 'feels' when grammatically it should be 'feel'.

To be honest it's not that big of a deal though

Edit: also there should probably be a 'was' in "as a guy that [was] also suicidal...."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, there is also almost certainly a secondary problem in that the parks and rescue services are underfunded to do such overhauls. Granted, some better off ones probably can and will but likely not all.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They functionally do, at almost all points in time there are enough capsules docked to the station for all astronauts to be able to return to Earth. The starliner capsule is currently able to return if needed, they are having it stay up there a bit longer to check things out to better understand why the one thruster is bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Turns out the missile in question is an intermediate range nuclear capable missile. So, on one hand it's possible we will see tactical nukes used in Ukraine, but on the other hand it will likely take a few years to get production back up and running after so long of not being in production.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I laughed at it and tried to upvote before realizing it was a screenshot lol

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes that is the joke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They very much are, the actual problem that happened was that audio channels got mixed up on a livestream. It's really not that big of a deal

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's fully free for me for some reason, maybe try clearing cookies to refresh your free articles?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

WE CAN DO BOTH!

The future of our energy generation is not a zero sum game, we can simultaneously build out and continuing developing solar, wind, mass storage, and other already proving things while also continuing development on SMR and building large nuclear reactors too. Sure, the nuclear options will take longer to bear fruit but we will likely still be needing more clean energy by the time they do, even with pumping out other renewables as fast as we can.

view more: ‹ prev next ›