Abstain. For one: Let everyone for themselves decide what they want to see or what they don't want to see. We're grown-up and don't need to tell other people what they should not or are not supposed to see.
(Just today there is a the_donald community sprouting on our instance. Should we allow that but defederate others?)
But the actual reason: let's first agree on guidelines when to defederate and then measure them against these.
Why should regular bikes use more energy, given they're only manufactured once (as are bikes), have no degenerating batteries and don't need electricity are less efficient than ebikes?
Und ich hab gerade gedacht da hat jemand die aktuellen Preise in DM umgerechnet 😂 und mich gefragt, ob echt schon /so/ teuer ist.
Pompeji was banned from gladiator games for a decade before vesuvius eruption because of fatal clashes of their hooligans.
What did you say that got you banned?
On the other hand, quite some people still need to grasp all intricacies of federation: we already have quite a few users over from kbin demanding defederation from a third party instance without realising it would not affect them at all.
Of course, it will be easy to sign up just for voting, but at least if you choose to do so, you know what you are doing...
So, you mean, we should make sure that doesn't change?
They don't actually, do they?
I did not say I want only active users be able to vote. I wanted to imply that the quorum needs to count against active users as opposed to all users of the instance.
Reason: there will very soon be a lot of unused accounts. Given enough of these, no vote could ever be successful.
We're just about to agree on the condition that only members of this instance should be allowed to vote. I am afraid that your proposal might not be compatible with that at the moment...
Useful for visually impaired users
Doubtful, given that it is much more sustainable replacing cogs and chain wheels only than to also replace the motor...