ahal

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

You do if third party clients aren't possible? You have control over what client the receiving end is using.

But apparently third party clients are possible, so it's moot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Of course, I fully agree! My point was just that you can eliminate the risk of poorly implemented cryptography at the endpoints. Obviously there's a thousand and one other ways things could go wrong. But we do the best we can with security.

Anyway apparently third party clients are allowed after all? So it's a moot point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Excellent point! If I'm sending someone information that could get me killed if it were intercepted by the state, I'd sure as hell want some guarantees about how the other side is handling my data. Disallowing third party clients gives me at least one such guarantee.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Imagine risking your life to capture a video in portrait

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like maybe your work place is understaffed tbh. I recognise I'm saying this from a position of privilege, but that sounds like the company's problem. Not yours.

Though as others have said, the law doesn't prevent you from working overtime if you want to. I hope the pay is worth it at least.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Rabbit and Steel - Cross between a bullet hell and roguelite with raid style gameplay. Requires very close co-ordination with your team to survive (up to 4 player co-op). Punishing but rewarding.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The mere fact this technology exists gives legislators a tool in their toolbox. I could imagine a future where the EU mandates use of PPA in certain circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, I also put most of the hot dogs I buy across the street in the fridge too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's a conundrum for sure

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Aww, lay off Jonathan. He's a pioneer for gay rights, which is much more than can be said for any of you lot.

Due to his advanced age, Jonathan spends his days doing almost everything with his mate, including eating, sleeping and mating... The sex of Frederica, ... his companion since 1991, was cast into doubt in 2017 when island veterinarian Catherine Man indicated that due to a deformity of its plastron its sex could not be verified,[4] and is now known to be male, being renamed Frederik.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Yes I understand. It works spelled that way. But "no pun intended" doesn't work because there was no pun in the initial setup. In my version both meanings make sense

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I always thought that joke needs an actual pun in the first half so the "no pun intended" has a valid double meaning. I came up with:

I told the sad ghost ten puns to raise its spirits. No pun intendid.

view more: ‹ prev next ›