Xanza

joined 1 week ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Check out MinIO. It's S3 compatible, so generally any tool which works with S3 will work with your instance. You can pair it with other FOSS applications like rclone. It's a great combo.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Probably just easier to nix the Prime subscription and just download scene releases... Most of them are h265 these days and are released same day as on Prime.

I just checked a list of "new to prime" and my tracker and they were all there. No reason to give money to Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Update came through this morning. 7.2.2-72806 Update 3.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The one thing I'll never recommend anyone selfhost is email. It's just plain not worth it.

You can do literally everything right and still get cucked by spam filters because you're not a recognized email provider.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If you're dealing with this much storage, it's time to upgrade to a rack. Don't deal with having to shove 10 drives into a packed full-size.

Start scouring 2nd hand auction sites and buy one used. They're pretty cheap as far as solutions go if you can grab them used. Something like this would be ideal: https://www.silverstonetek.com/en/product/info/server-nas/RM22-312/

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I currently use Telegram for my friends and family, but have reluctantly come to the conclusion that the UK Government is either reaching agreement for backdoors with messaging services, or is trying its hardest to.

Unless you start an encrypted chat, Telegram chats are not E2E.

I’m also on Element/Matrix. Before I try to get my contacts to join me on there, should I be aware of any privacy issues or is that a good place to head?

Host your own Matrix node, and then you don't have to worry about prying eyes. Realistically, instead of worrying about the protocol, worry about the content of the text. Use PGP to encrypt your own text and send it over clearnet. Who cares at that point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It will be in 10 years when a majority of their country has access to it. Industrialization in China is on a different level.

In less than 25 years they will take the top spot for global economy, and likely everything else.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Median property value in DC is $705,000.

She's likely living paycheck to paycheck as a sitting member of Congress. I like it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's pretty great. The only thing you have to remember is that the caddy instance and the container you're proxifying have to be within the same docker network. So you'll definitely want to use the caddy2 container if this is the setup you want to pursue.

If not then you can just use IP addresses inside or outside of a container it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Then I found out my services would work better with Caddy

Exceptional idea. Cloudflare is nice, but Caddy will always win IMO. Additionally, considering you were able to get Caddy working, that simply drives home that unfortunately your reverse_proxy didn't work because it was somehow misconfigured. Caddy is also a reverse_proxy.

My comment is pretty much what I said. You have an extremely complex environment that you're not fully making use of. For example, you're having issues with a reverse_proxy, but you had Tailscale presumably the whole time. Why not just use your VPN to reverse_proxy your requests if you were having issues?

Also using Caddy + Cloudflare is fine if you want to use cloudflare for DNS, however, Caddy handles all certificates itself. So you have Caddy, which can handle all the SSL certs itself, but you put Cloudflare on top of it to manage SSL certs. It's just convoluted.

It's a good environment, but a little overkill.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As someone who's set up and managed critical business applications I would say that it's perfectly fine to host your own provided you have decent hardware that's capable of doing what you need and as a dedicated business line to provide connection.

If you try to run mission critical business applications on a home internet connection you're going to have a really bad fucking time. But hosting business critical applications on appropriate hardware and a 1Gb/s business connection with an SLA is going to meet 95-98%% of all business applications.

If something like that sounds expensive or too difficult to do then it's too expensive or too difficult for you to host yourself. Just go with a provider and sidestep self-host.

view more: ‹ prev next ›