That's not quite right. It isn't that voters on the left are quick to abandon. They are fastest at disagreeing. Which, if not checked, will lead towards a desire to abandon.
The one great weakness of the left is our inability to agree to disagree. We all want our right to be the right and will shoot ourselves in the foot to prove it.
Post - Welcome: Irony.
If we all swallowed our disdain and moved forward together, we'd easily outstrip any efforts from the Right to win anything.
My favorite little story was while working short-term at a company. Had some issues, did my normal troubleshooting steps and Google searches, identified what I felt the issue was and knew I wouldn't have enough access to fix it. Reached out and got a response "Blah blah blaaah schedule blah blah Remote-In."
Later on he sent me a message and remotes into my computer. I take control quick, open up notepad, and type out "Hi!"
To this day I swear that little show earned me more difficult fake phishing attempts. Which I mention because he specifically told me one day he had experience in the information security sector. Lo' and behold!
Dunno, how many of your kind showed up on January 6th?
Cause it wasn't enough. Which was, by the way, rather rude.
I've posted that the truly idiotic are on the Right. I am slowly finding myself being corrected on that point.
Up to you. I said what I wanted to say. Whether you listen or not is, as always, your choice.
I won't ever ask you to not be jaded. In fact, I heavily recommend being wholly pissed. Only just that...the basics should continue. We should write those letters and vote. We should also be doing much more.
So in a way I'm right there with you.
There's the problem. You are unwilling to compromise. Change on this scale will require either a small miracle to do overnight, or I'd guess at least a solid 10 years of hard, consistent work by people much more intelligent and decisive than myself, and that's just to set the foundation and create the outline. The first is an act of God and I don't know about you, I'd rather keep religion out of this. That leaves the second, which means compromise to achieve a greater good over a longer period of time.
You see, I don't really care about your beliefs, or anyone else's, so far as they are yours to believe in. Thus action must take the place of opinion. I asked you to commit to something and the only action you were able to take was to tell all of us that you can't stand it. That choosing between what is statistically and factually a greater evil and one that is statistically and factually attempting to be a far lesser evil, is not something you can do.
I'll tell you what I believe in, and it's pretty simple: I believe in what I feel will do good by the world and by its people. Not complete good untarnished by greed or malice, just a good that tries to do right. It doesn't matter the source of the idea; all that matters is whether it is enacted in a way that helps more than it harms. Right, left, middle, none of this means anything. Though at the moment far more malice and hatred is coming from the Red than from anywhere else.
Malcom X and MLK fought for a more equal country, at the end of the day. If their words ring true in your ears at all, it should be obvious where your support must, by necessity, move towards. Else the only way out may be more Malcoms and more Martins.
You didn't answer my question. :)
I mean, in the last few months I carpet bombed an executive team with a well-written email and got a response within two days. If I can get the attention of some money-grubbin, tax dodging, narcissistic, wannabe dictator types to give a shit, I am sure we can collectively manage something.
Hahaha, yeah, you're right, we ain't biting. :)
You could, and this is just a thought, also choose to look up the many arguments and discussions on this exact topic online, since you're so keen to explore it. Bootstraps, my friend. Gotta put in the work!
It's interesting, this farce and display of pride and ego. All Biden has to do is one of two things:
Go all- in. Set up another debate. Make sure he's top of his game. Go full Dark Brandon and absolutely wipe the floor. Then apologize AFTER doing this for his previous bad performance. Do this right, reaaally sell it, and he'll come out the other side in a better position. Do it wrong and it'll hurt his campaign even more. Trump doesn't even have to show up. The point is giving Biden the same opportunity to step up. Toss in some late night talk shows with hard questions. When you have trust to gain back you have to work twice as hard.
Be a leader and talk to us all. Put forth a nominee to take his place. Work with them on the campaign trail and truly ask all of us to step up for our Nation, as one.
AND YET we appear to be getting some silly asinine middle-of-the-road choice.
I like Biden for many of the policies and steps he and his administration have taken these last four years. They've done good and sometimes even great things, and made mistakes and done bad things too. Over all, he's been far from the worst President. Now though is the time to step aside as a leader, or rise into that position and take control.
Maybe. Though I say we just come together, get his ass in, and then in the first year also get his ass out and let the VP or Speaker step in. Like it or not, changing now IS risky and it is arguable whether it's the better choice. I'll go with what the majority chooses because fighting against Trump and the GOP is what's important.
Let me repeat: We are in the game where we must do what the Republicans do and come together against a common enemy. So I recommend everyone agree on a candidate then shut up and checkmark that box. We can go back to verbally juxtaposing our positions through digital larping, or whatever it is we do when most of us forget politics exist for four years.