WoodScientist

joined 4 months ago
[–] WoodScientist 1 points 7 hours ago

It's still there!

[–] WoodScientist 2 points 8 hours ago

Cool? Yes. But the whole point of crank windows is mechanical simplicity. This is anything but that.

[–] WoodScientist 1 points 8 hours ago

Are we just turning into the bug aliens from Rick and Morty?

[–] WoodScientist 2 points 23 hours ago

I went without shampoo for two months because of this. Not my preferred means of hair care. I thought I was buying a twopack of shampoo off of Amazon. I actually bought a combined shampoo+conditioner package. The brand labeling was so prominent I didn't even notice. So instead of applying shampoo+conditioner, I was doing conditioner+a different conditioner. And it wasn't soo bad that it was immediately obvious. But yeah, I've fallen victim to this.

[–] WoodScientist 2 points 23 hours ago

Instructions unclear. Arrested for attempting to squat inside the last operative Blockbuster in Bend, Oregon. Turns out, the courts do NOT accept "childhood nostalgia" as a legal defense against breaking and entering.

[–] WoodScientist 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Is it possible to program a smartphone, so that, using gesture control of some sort, you can hang up a call by dramatically placing the phone down face first on a hard surface?

I SAID GOODDAY SIR!

[–] WoodScientist 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, I put down a deposit recently for a new car that will have roll down windows.

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 1 day ago

I am also Spartacus.

[–] WoodScientist 13 points 1 day ago

Truthfully it's a design issue. If people keep coming up to a door and pulling on it, it's because the design of the door is instructing them to do so. Design imparts information. A door in a home can have simple knobs - anyone living there can just learn which doors to push/pull. A door in a public space instead needs to be designed to tell people how to operate it, even without any labeling.

A door is a simple device. It shouldn't require reading labels or a manual. It's operation should be abundantly obvious. After all, even those who don't speak the language or are illiterate need to be able to operate doors. A door that needs instructions is one that is poorly designed.

[–] WoodScientist 2 points 1 day ago

I don't myself mind sharing the bathroom with a <N-word.> I am not some Klan member! But when my kids are involved, I have to draw a line. Kids aren't old enough to understand black people and their culture. Black folks need to use the bathroom at home or use a black-only bathroom. I'll happily share a bathroom with a black man, but my wife or kids shouldn't have to. They're just not equipped to handle the complexities of the situation. Don't call me a racist, I just have concerns for the safety of children.

Human garbage never changes.

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, fed through a woodchipper feet first.

[–] WoodScientist 22 points 1 day ago

Not discrediting the work she does but it’s not like any of us even have the chance to do what she’s doing

Horse shit. That's exactly what you're doing.

 

The people of California will be united again! California will be whole once more!

 

So this is a fun thought exercise. Here I dig into my Catholic upbringing and try to make a stretched doctrinal case for why literally praying to St. Luigi might just actually make sense from a religious perspective. I'm no longer a practicing Catholic myself, so take it as you will. This is just me trying to stretch doctrine to see if I can argue that praying to a literal St. Luigi may actually be doctrinally viable.

Inquiring minds want to know. If one wishes to take things too far and take the "St. Luigi" thing literally, how can that be possible? Can you really pray to a saint for divine intervention, when that saint is clearly still a mortal man walking among the living?

First, on saints. There are official saints of the Church, but technically those are just the ones that the Church has decided that beyond any reasonable doubt are actually in Heaven. But according to doctrine, there are likely millions of saints, people that have reached Paradise and can intercede on mortal behalf. We've only had enough evidence, such as repeated miracles, to provide enough evidence for the official list. And the canonization process involves miracles attributed to unofficial saints. Usually someone will pray to someone that isn't on the official list, and when they receive some purported miracle, such as an unlikely cancer recovery, that is attributed as a miracle to that unofficial saint. In fact, the only way someone can become an official saint is if people pray to them while they are an unofficial one.

So, that's how one might pray to St. Luigi, even though he isn't a recognized saint. But what about mortality? The man is clearly not in Heaven right now, he's sitting in jail. How can one possibly pray to a living man for divine intervention?

But here's where the doctrinal loophole comes in! You see, technically, Heaven exists outside of time and space. Time need not work the same way there it does here. If the spirit of a saint can reach beyond the bounds of the universe to intercede on mortal behalf, they can also reach across time as well. Heaven exists outside of space and time.

So if one prays to St. Luigi, you are not actually praying to the mortal man sitting in a jail in New York. Rather, you are praying to his ascended soul, which has the ability to intercede both forwards and backwards in time. Maybe Luigi will be executed. Maybe he'll live a long life and die of old age. But when he does, he will ascend to Paradise and become a saint. And he can then answer prayers from anyone, in any place, in any time.

So yeah, if that's your thing, doctrinally, a case can be made that it is perfectly fine to pray to a literal St. Luigi!

view more: next ›