WoodScientist

joined 3 months ago
[–] WoodScientist 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm telling you, don't mess around with magical tricksters. If you can't pay OP back, he'll probably take your soul, your first born child, your name, or some other demonic shit like that. Don't make a deal with Rumpelstiltskin, he will find a way to collect!

[–] WoodScientist 1 points 1 hour ago

I just try to avoid deals with magical beings of any kind. It never ends well. Thank you, but I'm more than capable of saving for retirement slowly with a regular retirement account. I don't care what the consequences may or may not be. I don't fuck around with magic.

[–] WoodScientist 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Something is very clearly happening with this subject, and it has been systematically ridiculed or put in separate categories of thought and no one is stopping to ask why.

There isn't something "clearly" happening with the subject of UFOs and aliens. UFO reports are people seeing weird lights in the sky and not understanding parallax. Do some people report direct contact with alien beings? Sure. But some people also report contact with angels, demons, leprechauns, bigfoot, and any number of other otherworldly phenomena. It's really not that complicated. People hallucinate and dream things, often based on pre-existing cultural exposure. There's very few people on Earth at this point that haven't seen depictions of a big eyed grey alien. And since everyone has seen these depictions, when people end up in altered states of consciousness through mental issues or psychotropic substances, that image serves as feedstock for their visions.

Yes, claiming that otherworldly beings are visiting us and interacting with people IS an extraordinary claim. It's something that would redefine our entire worldview and our understanding of our place in the universe. And we don't accept those types of claims based on flimsy and unreliable eyewitness testimony.

The most damning piece of evidence against UFOs and alien encounters is that the quality of visual evidence for these phenomena hasn't increased at all over the last 30 years. Every UFO is still an out-of-focus blob, and that's because it's only out of focus objects that can be mistaken as alien spaceships instead of ordinary objects like planes and balloons. And despite everyone now having HD cameras in their pocket, no one has ever managed to get a clear video of one of these grey aliens that are supposedly constantly flying around and fucking with people.

The quality of evidence for alien visitors is, from a scientific perspective, absolute dogshit. It's not repeatable. It's not reliable. It's not in a form that can be interrogated and examined critically.

Do you know what it took to get people to accept the heliocentric model of the Solar System? The exact opposite of that. It took multiple independent lines of evidence that could be independently verified. Galileo didn't say, "I have observed that the Earth goes around the Sun, and you'll just have to trust me." He said, "here are my pieces of evidence A, B, C, D, and E, here is my method, and if you build a telescope like mine, you can repeat my experiment and confirm everything I've done myself." And even then it took centuries for the heliocentric model to be accepted completely!

I'm sorry, but fuzzy out of focus dots and unreliable eyewitness testimony (often produced under hypnosis) is just absolute shit-tier evidence. And no, the recently military videos aren't any proof either, as they're also out of focus crap and clear parallax errors.

[–] WoodScientist 9 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

Do you think our astronomical theories were developed on word of mouth, rumor, and "trust me bro?"

[–] WoodScientist 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

I refuse to accept it. I don't make deals with magical tricksters. Same reason I don't fuck around with genies. It's just not worth it man.

[–] WoodScientist 1 points 6 hours ago

Swiss government bonds.

[–] WoodScientist 11 points 6 hours ago

When I woke up blind from surgery. Years ago I had FFS. Mine involved significant reshaping of the brow bone among other things. And like any surgery, beforehand the surgeon makes sure you're aware of the potential risks and complications. The rate of complications is low, but the risk isn't zero. If you're doing substantial work on your face, that can result in nerve damage, loss of feeling, loss of facial motor control, etc. The vast majority of people turn out just fine, but the risks are not zero and are always on your mind. Oh, and I did this in Buenos Aires cause I was a broke-ass 24 year-old not so long out of college. So add that to the fear of potential complications. I wasn't just getting major surgery. I was getting discount major surgery.

So I go in for surgery. Put the gown on, lay on the hospital cart, the whole nine yards. They give me the gas and I quickly go off to nowhere. Several hours later, I slowly regained consciousness, the surgery complete. And to my horror, I saw...nothing. Absolute darkness. Nothing at all. Pitch blackness. I command my eyes to open, but still nothing. Absolute inky blackness. I'm still hopped up on pain killers, but I'm quickly jolted to heightened awareness. I was aware of the risk of potential loss of feeling, but this? Blinded? Complete blindness in both eyes? I was in complete panic. Absolute terror.

Thankfully however this state did not last too long. A nurse realized what was wrong and helped me out. My eyes or ocular nerves hadn't somehow been damaged. My eyes were swollen shut. They were able to rinse out my eyes and help me to open them a bit, and it was clear that I would see just fine.

Ultimately, I didn't have any nerve damage and made a complete recovery. But that moment remains one of the most terrifying I have ever experienced. Alone in foreign country, thousands of miles from home, and I woke blind.

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Harrowing. But as someone unfamiliar with anything involving with anything naval, why the Hell did they have you do that? In conditions like that, why wouldn't you just cruise submerged and avoid the waves entirely? And why do they have people up there "on watch?" I can't imagine you can actually watch for that many things in such insane conditions. To my ear, it seems like they risked three lives and caused countless thousands of dollars to naval equipment for no damn good reason.

[–] WoodScientist 3 points 7 hours ago

I still remember reading the manual for the original Starcraft. That shit had some deep lore.

[–] WoodScientist 4 points 7 hours ago

Cover in spices. Eat raw. Spiced potato.

[–] WoodScientist 10 points 7 hours ago

Exactly. The religious nutjobs love Israel to fulfill their doomsday prophecies. The white supremacists love Israel so they can have somewhere to deport all the US Jews to.

Note how they deliberately conflate Judaism with Zionism? To a white supremacist, a Jew can never really be a true American. They'll always have some intrinsic loyalty to the state of Israel. To a white supremacist, deporting a US-born Jew to Israel isn't a crime at all; it's just sending them home.

[–] WoodScientist 4 points 7 hours ago

It's soulless and blandly inoffensive. Perfect for corporate slop. Certainly don't see many corporations embracing Soviet Realism.

 

The people of California will be united again! California will be whole once more!

 

So this is a fun thought exercise. Here I dig into my Catholic upbringing and try to make a stretched doctrinal case for why literally praying to St. Luigi might just actually make sense from a religious perspective. I'm no longer a practicing Catholic myself, so take it as you will. This is just me trying to stretch doctrine to see if I can argue that praying to a literal St. Luigi may actually be doctrinally viable.

Inquiring minds want to know. If one wishes to take things too far and take the "St. Luigi" thing literally, how can that be possible? Can you really pray to a saint for divine intervention, when that saint is clearly still a mortal man walking among the living?

First, on saints. There are official saints of the Church, but technically those are just the ones that the Church has decided that beyond any reasonable doubt are actually in Heaven. But according to doctrine, there are likely millions of saints, people that have reached Paradise and can intercede on mortal behalf. We've only had enough evidence, such as repeated miracles, to provide enough evidence for the official list. And the canonization process involves miracles attributed to unofficial saints. Usually someone will pray to someone that isn't on the official list, and when they receive some purported miracle, such as an unlikely cancer recovery, that is attributed as a miracle to that unofficial saint. In fact, the only way someone can become an official saint is if people pray to them while they are an unofficial one.

So, that's how one might pray to St. Luigi, even though he isn't a recognized saint. But what about mortality? The man is clearly not in Heaven right now, he's sitting in jail. How can one possibly pray to a living man for divine intervention?

But here's where the doctrinal loophole comes in! You see, technically, Heaven exists outside of time and space. Time need not work the same way there it does here. If the spirit of a saint can reach beyond the bounds of the universe to intercede on mortal behalf, they can also reach across time as well. Heaven exists outside of space and time.

So if one prays to St. Luigi, you are not actually praying to the mortal man sitting in a jail in New York. Rather, you are praying to his ascended soul, which has the ability to intercede both forwards and backwards in time. Maybe Luigi will be executed. Maybe he'll live a long life and die of old age. But when he does, he will ascend to Paradise and become a saint. And he can then answer prayers from anyone, in any place, in any time.

So yeah, if that's your thing, doctrinally, a case can be made that it is perfectly fine to pray to a literal St. Luigi!

view more: next ›