Weerdo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So, that whole section for Spock on being a Vulcan, That's the video clip they're going to give new actors for Vulcans isn't it? Right down to the prosthetics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Read only use is hardly good though, that's just coating them money. You want engagement from users to drive ads.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Read only might not need an auth session, so no API token. Id have to go check the docs again been a while since I messed with it.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They'll win in the end when the internet gets board like always. Still, it'll be fun to watch burn, knock some value off the IPO.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, now I want RIF too, completion is good!

In all seriousness this is good to see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But, you're here?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Always stealing the Enterprise, someone needs to start lojacking the thing. By the time of the movies with Kirk it's been stolen, what four or five times?

I do like that they were instantly caught.

I can see why it's a standard training scenario by the time of Lower Decks.

A bit action heavy for Star Trek, but I'm hoping that its just a bombastic opening, I cant really complain. I am surprisingly liking the development with Spock, and overall the crew interactions.

Looking forward to the rest of the season.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I like that the code is 451, but yeah no one is going to explicitly use it when they're blocking things. A little too on the nose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Alright so not just me, it's useful but out of date. Some of these are still good, others have been replaced.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I have a feeling they got a massive number of those,ni am one of them as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yep. It turns out there is no such thing as a 'balanced' social network.

Which is analogous to life, depressingly enough.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've always thought about creating some metric to weight users who create comments with the most engagement as higher. That leads to the most controversial or dividing comments rising though.

Some impartial judgement via mod points and or community awards to weigh valuable users would be nice.

The issue is any of these would be gamed, it might be possible today to use an AI model like ChatGPT but that's got its own biases.

So for the moment I can't think of a better system than upvote downvote.

view more: next ›