V0ldek

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

Also, Musk would’ve been much better off commissioning someone to make the image he wanted rather than grabbing a screencap Aicon openly said he was not allowed to use

Well, Musk is famously great at taking a no as an answer.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (11 children)

It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

In my mind "being inseminated by" is like 1% of "having a child with", if that. It's probably the least consequential thing your father may do in your overall upbringing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (16 children)

The thing with IVF is that it's already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

Like, read some of the parameters they'd screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I'm sorry? You're looking for a better-educated sperm?

And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. "I want my cum to be a pilot!" The fuck.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But it's specifically cartoon supervillain shit. It's not even a Bond villain, those are way too serious in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

“President and CEO of the World” who wants your eyeballs for his menacing orbs.

Unsatirisable, supervillain shit. Mr. Incredible should kick his ass.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

has a plan to profit

You say "plan" but I think what you really mean is that Satya crossed his fingers and hoped for the best

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

MS is doing the laughing as every company scrambles to adopt AI purely out of fear of being left behind

Hey man, as someone who literally worked at MSFT in Azure Identity a year ago, let me assure you, this is exactly what MSFT is also doing while their devs scratch their heads in bewilderment on how on earth they're going to incorporate genAI into the auth token service.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (16 children)

but they must be making money off X if they’re doing this.

is such a laughable, ridiculous thing to say, like what the fuck dude, where did you get this idea from even

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The what in the what now?

What a terrible day to tech.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's no way this works, right? It's like a 5y.o.'s idea of a gotcha.

This would be like starting a tax-exempt charity to gather up a large amount in donations and then switching to a for-profit before spending it on any charitable work and running away with the money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

the second is characteristically christian and associated with dignity culture.

homeless people bear the imago dei. they are not intrinsic moral superiors but their plight is a shame to us because it denudes them of the dignity that should be theirs by right of their humanity.

Lol yes, that's exactly the way mainstream Christians view homelessness, their lack of Work Ethic :tm: is a "shame to us". Lmao even.

Christian charitable organisations are so well-known for their ethos of inherent human dignity.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus GNU Christ, Live your life so that no one ever produces a systematic classification of your opinions that looks like this

view more: ‹ prev next ›