TempleSquare

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Other way around:

Sites that COMPLY with laws and exit the state leave behind sites that do not comply.

The sites you CAN reach in Texas are more likely to have trafficking victims and underage participants -- because those sites clearly don't give a hoot about laws.

Texas drove away the wrong sites!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes. They want "small government" when the law affects them, but "law and order" when it punishes someone else who annoys them.

It's childishness we've come to be accustomed to, thanks to lead-brained 70-year-olds who are falling into legit cognitive decline... but still have the numbers to be a formidable opponent at the polls on election day.

Also, their dicks don't work anymore without a blue pill, so they may as well take away the consensual naked fun of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z (18+) people right?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's worse: Reputable sites that comply with U.S. laws (such as participants being 18+ and filming of their own free will) are effectively forced out, while questionable site carry on.

The likelyhood of seeing abuse victims or underage in Texas goes up, not down.

If they truly cared about protecting minors, they'd see the flaw in their law and rectify it. Of course, we all know (not through cynicism but cold repeated behavior) that political conservatives do not care about minors and care far more about punishing consenting adults.

This law is a step toward the latter.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

At this point, it's just a temper tantrum.

Democrats/scientists/experts/youth are the "annoying older brother" and anything they want is "stupid."

Lead poisoning (gasoline) really ruined a generation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Until governments ban private jet travel, we just won't see serious public support. People struggling economically will fight back against taking on the brunt of the cuts.

Nobody actually wants to cut their carbon footprint, including well-meaning wealthy who advocate for change.

We're collectively in a heartbreaking devastating mess.

[–] [email protected] 134 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Remember how Governor Wallace said, "Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever"?

What most people don't know is that decades later, he went to a lot of work to try to undo the damage he caused and advocate for civil rights. The problem was, the damage had been done a lot of it. Very real people have had their lives injured. He egged on voters into bigotry longer than they needed to be.

I can't help but feel that the last 10 years or so, we've been watching the same thing. All of this is going to age like milk. Future (and even current) generations suffering (or who will soon suffer) the effects of the climate crisis, are going to universally find moments like tonight universally outrageous.

History won't be written by baby Boomers. It's going to be written by the gen alpha kids who will be the adults when we're old and gone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Wait until they see "Smoke Hub" in Bakersfield, CA.

It's literally the porn hub logo.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yep. Disney+ (for now).

Netflix, HBO, and Hulu gradually cancelled over the last few years.

What's stupid of them is that if they'd stayed around $8-10/mo each (ad-free), I probably would have stayed subscribed forever. Now they each get nothing.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't mind Spotify increasing.

Inflation is real. And nobody wants to see the service turn into a Little Caesars "$5 Hot N Ready" pizza that erodes in quality, rather than gradually price increase with inflation.

The advantage we have with music streamers is that nearly ALL the content is on ALL the services. So, if one service goes bananas with pricing, we can jump ship to a cheaper one.

But TV is siloed into mini monopolies. The only source of capitalism competition they face is use choosing to do without. And frankly, if I'm gonna be forced-fed ads, I choose to do it on YouTube which costs me $0 and not $7.99 a month.

Netflix is gone. And as someone who leaves The Simpsons running 24/7 on Disney+, I'm frankly getting thiiiiiiiiiis close to dumping their asses, too!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Former RiFfer here. Although I'm playing with Sync at the moment as I type this, I've gravitated toward Connect quite a lot. It's not Rif but it feels familiar.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I dream that one day there is a RiF for Lemmy. But alas, he's building an app for tildes.

 

Now the fun of seeing Exmormons look at the books side by side to see what changes, for good or bad, have happened.

Rumors swirling that kinder language toward LGBTQ in the old edition has mysteriously vanished.

 

News update -- so you don't have to visit that other social media site. Evidently, the church is going to voluntarily start requiring background checks in the UK. Hopefully this expands to the rest of the world in time.

The fact that the LDS church doesn't require background checks in 2023 is beyond the pale. But it's where we are. And protecting victims is job one.

 

Obviously, this is no shock. GM isn't going to dump their pickups until the EV models are proven reliable, profitable, and hot sellers.

Frankly 10 to 12 years may even be a tad optimistic, barring some catastrophe that makes oil/gasoline difficult to buy

 

Had a fascinating chat with my high-school senior cousin (who is 20 years younger than me) about her plans after graduation next year. Obviously BYU is not on the table.

For her, it's sooooo different than it was for me.

Mr Millennial here first got upset over doctrinal issues. Went through a whole "the church lied to me" phase. And eventually came around to injustices in LDS doctrine and culture.

But that's not how it works for her and her peers. She feels the church is a tiny club with rules so non-inclusive that almost nobody qualifies. So why would anyone want to join it at all?

Furthermore, her short life has seen a church so focused on anti-LGBT that there was little else positive to glean from Sunday. She actually views the church as an immoral organization.

We (older crowd) fell away from the church. They had us. They lost us.

But for her... the church never even got close to winning her over to begin with.

Anyway, it was a fascinating observation

 

Okay. Well, that should act like a bat signal to call over all the car enthusiasts.

Welcome to Lemmy!

view more: next ›