[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

As a même Said, we have to deadname it,

Twitter is shit.

4
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
50
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
7
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15141963

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15138807

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

9
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15138807

The United States House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill that would expand the federal definition of anti-Semitism, despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

The bill passed the House on Wednesday by a margin of 320 to 91, and it is largely seen as a reaction to the ongoing antiwar protests unfolding on US university campuses. It now goes to the Senate for consideration.

If the bill were to become law, it would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

IHRA’s working definition of anti-Semitism is “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities”.

According to the IHRA, that definition also encompasses the “targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity”.

The group also includes certain examples in its definition to illustrate anti-Semitism. Saying, for instance, that “the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” would be deemed anti-Semitic under its terms. The definition also bars any comparison between “contemporary Israeli policy” and “that of the Nazis”.

Rights groups, however, have raised concerns the definition nevertheless conflates criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism with anti-Semitism.

In a letter sent to lawmakers on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) urged House members to vote against the legislation, saying federal law already prohibits anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment.

“Instead, it would likely chill free speech of students on college campuses by incorrectly equating criticism of the Israeli government with anti-Semitism.”

Archive link

[-] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago

Not to soon to qualify IDF as Nazis I hope.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago

Dota is the way

[-] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

One of my paradoxes, im anticapitalist and I'm greeting valve for their work on steamdeck (not an owner) and proton.
That's participate to democratize the use of Linux as a daily OS a lot.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

You are not their bro

[-] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Privately, because outloud, would appears as antisemitic, for Zionists and all the voices on their sides

[-] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Did u see someone cheering the mass murder here ?

The situation is "black and white ? No !

I can apply your rethoric to you. You are right to be chocked and ashamed of this, but you should be chocked and ashamed for all humans life not just one kind. Palestinians live since they are baby in terror. Its not news for them. Israelians can have a life, not perfect but they have it.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago

Its like that for more than 20years now.

Even israel it self and other countries under Israel aggrement , finance the Hamas for years now, to rebuild again and again...

[-] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

I already tested it,
It was good enough,

For me, I don't want to use their resources, because this service has an cost, and its better used by journalists, activists etc, rather me to download shitty Hollywood movies.

Speaking just for me ofc. No judging

[-] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What a beautiful society where companies have more powers than an state...

Ofc theses companies have our futurs in mind, right ?

Capitalism.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

Theses 2 guys are the same, at different period of life for each,

[-] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

LOL.

When i see in our democracy, how we fight to keep up our rights.... Well...

view more: next ›

TGhost

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF