If they have such high public support why doesn't the public vote accordingly?
Syntha
only 30% thought disruptive tactics were effective for issues with high awareness but low support
I just went to look for the catcalling article you mentioned (it's this one) and she is obviously not "complaining" about not getting catcalled. Instead, she's talking about how her ageing affects her sense of self-worth. Her getting catcalled less often is only the impetus of this reflection, not the actual source of her negative feelings.
This is completely insane and no economist agrees with your conspiracy theory.
Why would job cuts be temporary if demand stays low?
"Never thought I'd fight side by side with a Russian"
"What about side by side with a homophobe?"
As if this is what was needed to prove it. Trump once answered a question about the failings of western liberalism by talking about how liberal cities on the west coast were doing badly.
Please lead by example
The argument isn't that they're "evil", it's that they could be used as tools by strategic rivals.
Nvidia is already profitable and has been for over a decade.
This is terminal murica-brain. My condolences.