SuddenDownpour

joined 1 year ago
[–] SuddenDownpour 8 points 5 months ago

Don't ask what's it like for our remains in the future.

[–] SuddenDownpour 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Plenty of Conservatives wouldn't be so terminally angry about women dressing immodestly if they didn't also think that masturbation is wrong. You ought to learn to surf the flow of the horny.

[–] SuddenDownpour 11 points 5 months ago

There are two explanations which I don't find ludicrous, if you assume the shooter to be far right:

  • He was a Qanoner who bought the "we've gotta hunt the pedophiles" but didn't develop the cognitive dissonance to also think "but that doesn't mean Trump obviously".

  • He was angry about Trump trying to distance himself from Project 2025 (even though that was merely rhetoric, but an angry and radical 20 years old may not understand that).

[–] SuddenDownpour 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey folks, you ain't gonna believe this,

[–] SuddenDownpour 20 points 5 months ago

Listen, folks. We're in the "here's how Bernie can still win" timeline. The first step is for Biden's COVID to be extremely virulent, and then for Trump to have another funny little guy with a gun and wacky intentions in his rear /s

[–] SuddenDownpour 3 points 5 months ago

Things suck, they insulted me personally and should be burnt in fire under the pain of a thousand screams, and if you disagree you're going into the fire as well. Hope you appreciated the opinion of your local mentally ill individual ❤️

[–] SuddenDownpour 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I mentioned it as a factor, not as an all-determining fact that explains the whole of Israeli demographics.

[–] SuddenDownpour 33 points 5 months ago

Your average law enforcement agent already has a worrying tendency to be a moron. Now imagine if that person is also a conspiracy theorist.

[–] SuddenDownpour 10 points 5 months ago

I think... I think it's one that begins at "Il" and ends with "legal". So it's legal after all! Nothing to see here, folks, move along.

[–] SuddenDownpour 7 points 5 months ago

Pedro Sánchez was an hypocrite during his first years under the spotlight of national politics. Watching him grow a spine and become a decent president that I'm sometimes even a bit proud of has been a surprise for sure, but a welcome one.

[–] SuddenDownpour 5 points 5 months ago

For the unaware, some people use "map" as an acronym for "minor-attracted person". Which is an extremely weird thing to build your identity upon imho. Just get therapy or whatever, I won't judge you if you don't abuse another person, but why would anyone grow attached to a personal leaning that will only bring pain upon themselves or others?

[–] SuddenDownpour 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

There's a very logical filter at play here: if you didn't think seeking beef with Arabs and participating in a colonialist project in the 50s/60s/70s was a good idea, you would have stayed in the US, and otherwise, you would have moved to Israel. This made it so that Jews in the US lean liberal and Jews in Israel lean ethno-nationalistic, in very broad terms.

 

There should be no question that oil-based car-centric cultures are unsustainable for the environment, and in some extremes like the US simply result in terrible city layout. No disagreements here, I hope.

But there's something I've never seen addressed, and it's how fucking miserable having to use public transport can get if the people you're sharing it with are simply rude.

You've just finished your 8,5 hours workday. Work was extremely dull, but even if it wasn't you could have barely got anything done anyway because there was were construction works right outside the office, and the hammering and drilling is still echoing in your ears. You need to get home at the other side of the city, and you don't have a car nor the money to take a taxi, so you take a bus. Can you finally relax away from that disgusting noise? Well, there should be no reason for anything being excessively loud, other than perhaps some vehicle's motor. Except that fuck you.

It's the year 2023 of the current era, someone has put 300€ into buying a last gen Xiaomi - but apparently they didn't budget appropriately, because rather than buying earbuds, that someone has decided to share with everyone else the sound of non-stop Youtube shorts. Apparently everyone else seems to have had a more sensible shopping list, because they start taking out their earbuds or headphones. Rather than, you know, have the person being annoying silence their phone.

On a different day, you sigh in relief when you find the bus near empty. Less numbers means less chances for disturbances, of course, you can even go at the very end of the bus to be alone. Someone enters the bus, talking through her phone. She stays near the entrance. There shouldn't be issues here, right? Normal people normally talk through their normal phones all the time. But does she need to SHOUT when she does it? Does someone in the literal opposite end of the bus need to hear all about her annoying kids and her annoying husband and her annoying life? Wouldn't she rather save herself the pain of a sore throat the next morning?

You take the bus again next week. There's a tough looking guy a seat in front of you. He is actually a polite person though, because he is using headphones. Not everyone seems to share the same impression, because two old women have clearly decided not sitting immediately near to him, to the point that one of them will take the seat next to you and the other one will stay up, just so that she doesn't have to share a seat with the other guy. No problem with their dumb prejudices yet. You do have a problem, however, when they start increasing their tone of voice further and further, as if you weren't right next to them, nor trying to read, nor blasting your headphones in a vane attempt to not to hear their rambling. Suddenly, two seats are freed up up ahead, directly facing the tough looking guy. You're finally about to find bliss, you think, as this lady who saw Tutankhamun be born surely needs a seat for her frail, old legs. But no. Their fear of young, fit men with cheap shirts is stronger than their desire to actually sit together, to the point that when you suggest to them to take the seats up ahead so that they don't have to shout to your ear they get offended.

I lived for some years in a city with great bus and subway infrastructure, but very early on I had to stop taking the bus because the people using it were indifferent to the fact that they were sharing a public space, that they don't have the right to make it as miserable for everyone else as they see fit. Do not dare to try and make them behave with some consciousness either, because it'll be a toss up between them actually recognizing the issue and doing better or actively turning into willing assholes.

Almost never had this issue in the subway, though, and I don't know why despite it being far more packed. Only exception was one night when an English football team was at the city, and so were its hooligans. I've used train far less, but I don't remember it being a problem either. People being annoying is obviously a cultural issue, we aren't naturally wired to always strive to be little shits. But when being little shits is the norm, having to share a space with everyone else becomes misery.

What would you do to incentivize good public manners, and to prevent antisocial behavior, at any level or scale?

 

A leading discount supermarket in Germany has raised the prices of a selection of its products to reflect their real cost on people’s health and the environment.

In a week-long experiment in all 2,150 branches of the Penny chain, a range of nine products, mainly dairy and meat, will be priced at what experts from two universities have deemed to be their true cost, in relation to their effect on soil, climate, water use and health.

The “wahre Kosten” or “real costs” campaign has seen the price of wiener sausages rise from €3.19 to €6.01, mozzarella go up by 74% to €1.55, and fruit yoghurt increase by 31% from €1.19 to €1.56.

The awareness promotion week is taking place in conjunction with academics from the Nuremberg Institute of Technology and the University of Greifswald, and was triggered by the conviction among consumer researchers that price tags in supermarkets in no way reflect the true environmental or long-term health costs of producing the foodstuffs and getting them on to retailers’ shelves.

Included are a range of foods from cheese and other dairy products to processed meats such as sausages, as well as vegan meat replacements such as vegan schnitzels (which were given a moderate 5% increase). Wiener sausages and the popular maasdamer cheese, which has risen by 94% to €4.84, are among the items to go up most in price. Regarding the cheese, the scientists calculated hidden costs of 85 cents for climate-harming emissions such as methane and CO2, as well as 76 cents for damage to the soil from intensive farming and animal feed production, 63 cents for the effect of pesticides used, including their impact on the health of farmers, as well as 10 cents for pollution of groundwater through the use of fertiliser.

The discounter has said it will donate the excess proceeds it makes from the sales, without commenting on whether it was prepared to take a knock in profits. The charity Zukunftsbauer or Future Farmer, which supports family-run farms in Alpine regions, many of which are increasingly struggling to survive amid low returns or sometimes even making losses on their produce, will be the beneficiary.

“We wish to create an awareness around the hidden environmental costs of groceries,” Penny’s chief operating officer, Stefan Görges, told German media. “We need to put out the uncomfortable message that the prices of our foodstuffs which are accrued along the supply chain in no way reflect the environmental on-costs.”

Dr Amelie Michalke, an industrial engineer and sustainability expert from the University of Greifswald in northern Germany, said it was not yet possible to present the real cost to health and the environment for more than a select range of products. The experiment had therefore been limited to a smaller range for which it had been possible to make realistic calculations. “There is a lack of comprehensive scientific groundwork on this. But we hope this will give us a strong impulse to discuss and consider prices for groceries in a way that is user-friendly and fair,” she said.

view more: ‹ prev next ›