StorminNorman

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, they admitted they were wrong, then they doubled down and plowed right on ahead with being wrong. Which is still more than you've contributed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

So? I never claimed it wasn't. Maybe me being able to point out someone is being an arsehole is cos I'm one. Doesn't change the fact that they're still an arsehole.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I could say the same to you. At least I contributed to the conversation. What have you done besides try and show off how small your metaphorical dick is?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

We don't have the reputation Americans have. Especially online. We may be just as bad, which is a matter of personal opinion, but we sure as shit don't prove it online so often and readily as those yanks do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They don't. Go and reread what I wrote, then come back here and quote the part of my comment where I said that.

And I again refer you back to what I previously wrote, your priorities change as you age. Mine did. I'm far more likely to have sex with a partner who's company I enjoy than someone who's company I don't enjoy. That aside, I didn't say you're gonna just start solely having sex with only people you have good company with. I didn't even say that you'd stop trying to have sex with people you were physically attracted to. I said your standards will change. Which insinuated that maybe you might not have slept with someone when you were 18yo cos they didn't meet your criteria of being attractive back then, but you might now cos your standards have changed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Bandcamp, qobuz, bleep, Beatport, theres a number of options out there to pick up cheap digital music. And then you also have the aforementioned eBay and discogs etc. Which, true, is second hand. But even splitting the amount the artist makes from that physical release between you and the person who previously bought it, they are still making way more from you than they would from just your streams.

And sure, 216 albums doesn't seem like much. But they'd be all yours. Nobody could take them from you (well, besides if you got physically robbed I guess). There's a bunch of stuff that has disappeared off of there. Big Black, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, Joanna Newsom, off the top of my head. You also have artists that have never been on there, Tatsuro Yamashita comes to mind. It also used to be a real problem with artists like Tool, The Beatles, AC/DC just not being there at all too. Then there's other times where I've been playing albums, and tracks are just straight up missing (I presume due to licensing issues). I remember being royally annoyed with A Cross The Universe missing a bunch of tracks ages ago, and it used to happen frequently enough with other releases that it made an impression. Plus all the classic hip-hop that is missing cos of sample clearance issues. And heaven forbid if you wanna listen to classical music, or traditional music from around the world, it's as if Spotify has never heard of the genre (both genres are represented, but it's such a poor showing that they would've done better if there was just none at all). And I understand that this isn't all on Spotify, but I've never had any of those issues with my personal collection.

Is it perfect? No. Does it reward the artist fairly? Undoubtedly. Would I take it over Spotify? Every day of the year for the rest of my life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

To be pedantic, there was DRM on music purchased on iTunes prior to 2009. Was a bit of a ballache converting that back in the day. Could've been worse though, I do like to buy most of my music physically so I didn't have to convert too much of my collection (still a ballache though cos it was still way more files than I wanted to convert).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait, what? That seems odd. They've deleted music videos from my account (which I had the files for, and the videos in question were also pulled from YouTube etc by the band, so I don't think it's apple's fault they were pulled), but I still have all the music I've made myself. I do back it up every 2 or 3 months (I would cry for the rest of my life if I lost it, I have nearly 2yrs of continuous music), but I've never had to restore it (and this has reinforced why I do back up).

Edit: looked it up, I see the issue now. I don't use Apple music, and every instance I can find of this happening is associated with ceasing that subscription. But I just use iTunes and the iTunes store. Dunno how this would work for you since it's your own music (and I dunno if it'd work for music not in the iTunes catalogue, ie stuff from Bandcamp, qobuz, cough cough less than legal methods, etc), but it would appear all you have to do is log in to your account again and re-download the deleted files.

Second edit: just realised I have lost some actual music from my account. The series of live albums that iTunes directly released from the iTunes festivals they ran like 15yrs ago just came to mind. They're gone from my account. And probably a bunch of others. They were never deleted from my hard drive though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I'm already starting to have trouble with it. I've been perusing all on here cos the few communities I've found that fit my hobbies are pretty dead and I'm done with them for the day in less than 5mins. And being in all has exposed me to a shit load of ai porn. A lot is very obviously generated, but a lot of it also makes me double check what instance I'm on as it is super good at generating "real people" that look convincing. It's not quite perfect, but it's good enough to confuse me a little. Hell, there's the odd one or two that I see where I legitimately can't tell if it's real or generated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Which part of that was directed at you? I didn't lump you in the "most people" category. You did that. I also didn't disparage you with the second sentence. Nor with the third. It's all talking about people and your country in general. None of it singles you out. I can understand how an idiot might think that, but that doesn't mean it makes it the case. Now, I did go you in my next comment, I'll admit that. But that was only in reply to you. Like I said before, jog on you sanctimonious prick.

Never mind, I just looked at your profile and have seen you're American. I take back what I said about you being an idiot, for the average American that goes online, you're basically Einstein...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Naw, did I offend the idiots feelings? You came at me first, mate, if you can't handle the heat, don't even step into the kitchen...

Also, if you were truly offended, you wouldn't have made this latest comment at all. But you just haaaaaaad to tell the world how much more "better" you are. Jog on.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (14 children)

Hang the fuck on. You somehow think that your experience living on a "small island" speaks for "the average person"? Get to fuck. I guarantee your islands population isn't even large enough to be a rounding error on the global scale. My attitude is fine considering I didn't realise I was talking to an actual moron.

But this whole thread illustrates a problem the internet has as a whole, fuckwits like you don't even bother to research anything. You read something in discussions and chose to take it as gospel without bothering to check if it had a shred of truth to it? And then doubled down on it as if your tiny worldview somehow was what everyone experiences? There is no difference between you doing that and those who treat Fox News as the holy truth. I may have "attitude" now, but it's cos I have to occasionally deal with people like you, and I don't suffer fools gladly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›