SleepyHarry

joined 1 year ago
[–] SleepyHarry 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trigger warning: r*ddit link

[–] SleepyHarry 3 points 1 year ago

Same feelings / background here. Navigation will take me a little to grok, but I'm liking it so far.

[–] SleepyHarry 16 points 1 year ago

Why would it be illegal? It's shitty and it's obvious what they're trying to do, but I can't fathom what law from any jurisdiction this would violate.

[–] SleepyHarry 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I love Python, it's not the easiest language to do high freq low latency work on as I imagine algotrading would demand.

How have you worked around this, if at all?

I can't find a way to word this that doesn't sound really aggressive, the question is in good faith!

[–] SleepyHarry 1 points 1 year ago

That side of it I wholeheartedly agree with. Perhaps I'm just deluding myself into thinking technology awareness early on makes for better legal infrastructure to handle its effect on society. I really would like that to be the case.

But yeah agree, "ChatGPT" being synonymous with "groundbreaking AI" to the vast majority of the public (I suspect) is not great from a monopoly perspective.

[–] SleepyHarry 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

On the politicians / rulemakers side of things, that may or may not be a good thing tbh. Technology moves so fast and traditionally the aforementioned groups are glacial and can't keep up, sometimes to the benefit of a small group, often to the detriment of the majority. Having this on their radar relelatively soon is potentially a useful change.

view more: ‹ prev next ›