Shizrak

joined 2 years ago
[–] Shizrak 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I think you sound ridiculous... So agree to disagree there.

[–] Shizrak 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Reply to edit:

Nope. Just don't like petty authoritarians.

[–] Shizrak 1 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Oh, it's hyperbolic, but it gets the point across.

[–] Shizrak -2 points 5 months ago (13 children)

Oh I'm sure you have a way to justify your corrupt authoritarianism. I don't care what your reasoning is. If you ban people without them breaking rules, then the only actual rule is "don't upset the power tripping bastards", which I strongly disagree with.

[–] Shizrak 0 points 5 months ago (15 children)

How is this upvoted so much? This is fucking insane.

"Oh, just ban whoever even if they didn't break any rules"

[–] Shizrak 10 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Wonderful strawman that doesn't address his point.

[–] Shizrak -1 points 5 months ago
[–] Shizrak 3 points 5 months ago

Just finished chopping a bunch wood. I don't get it /s

[–] Shizrak 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So community notes can address more instances of misinformation, that part is true.

But if the community provides misinformation as the "note" then it can actually spread and legitimize misinformation.

So superior is definitely the wrong word for it. Perhaps more efficient? But also more likely to reinforce echo chambers.

Superior would be implementing community notes and then having those checked by centralized fact checkers.

[–] Shizrak 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, other people who disregard facts share your opinion.

[–] Shizrak 4 points 5 months ago

God forbid people have fun.

[–] Shizrak 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So they removed fact checking, and someone lied? Oh my, what a surprise.

view more: ‹ prev next ›