RegularGoose

joined 1 year ago
[–] RegularGoose 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Have you tried just living in your cubicle and having them take rent out of your paycheck?

[–] RegularGoose 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why would we not have those things? Are you incapable of conceptualizing having motivations for creating and doing things other than for financial profit? Why, in your estimation, can't we have a system were people do things because they care about those things and they're worth doing because they benefit everyone?

Money is an artificial construct serves no real purpose other than to consolidate power and resources into the hands of a few by depriving the many and keeping them in servitude. Removing money as a motivation, if something is worth having, people will want to have it, which means that some of those people will still choose make/do that thing for their own benefit, which in turn benefits everyone.

If the point of working for money is to use that money to obtain goods and services, there's no reason to just get rid of the money aspect and just make those goods and services available directly. The only thing that really changes is that we stop over-working ourselves to over-produce frivolous bullshit for the sake of generating more wealth for the wealthy while being denied the fruits of that work.

[–] RegularGoose 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If we're not going to abolish money, it should really be entirely illegal for the highest paid person in a company to make more than, say, 15-20 times more than the lowest paid person.

[–] RegularGoose 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Too many people seem to think that chattel slavery is the only thing that counts as slavery, and that even that doesn't count if a slaver is less horrible to their slaves than other slavers are.

[–] RegularGoose -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't need to live in a place to know that heat domes, droughts, and rampant wildfires do not describe a place that's "probably survivable." You will not be able to live there 15-20 years from now.

[–] RegularGoose 5 points 1 year ago

I would have celebrated, but I had to work today.

[–] RegularGoose 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a joke, not a character analysis.

[–] RegularGoose 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup. Famously, no one ever created art until capitalism came around to turn it into a commodity.

[–] RegularGoose 2 points 1 year ago

Beatings, solitary confinement, humiliation, denial of basic needs, etc, etc, etc. It's a big list.

[–] RegularGoose 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Did you forget what happened there last summer?

[–] RegularGoose 5 points 1 year ago

Would you rather go back to white people invading third world countries? That's the alternative. I sure don't want that, you're a shitty person if you do.

[–] RegularGoose 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

You're missing the concept completely. It's not about not perfoming labor, it's about eliminating work.

Labor is performing tasks that need to be done to meet the needs of the individual and the community. That's not what work is. Work is exploitation. Work is about financial profit for the benefit of the powerful few at the expense of the worker.

Work is parasitism. It forces us into a life of ruthless, competitive struggle and leaves the loser majority in miserable, pointless servitude. Labor is an act of necessity and generosity, not a commodity. It has purpose and serves the whole, which then serves the individual. Labor creates, supports, and improves the community, while work domineers it and drains it for the profit of others.

view more: ‹ prev next ›