Plebcouncilman

joined 4 months ago
[–] Plebcouncilman -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol

This particular strain of brainrot is so funny to me.

[–] Plebcouncilman -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It would have been a byproduct of them that I believe he doesn’t give a fuck about, but he has allude to in a few occasions.

I agree on the second point. The tariffs needed to be wide ranging but somewhat phased. But he can’t do that because he knows he doesn’t have the time, so like everything else he’s doing it with the startup mentality of move fast and break shit. Which I favor in this particular case because I don’t see a neoliberal corpo puppet democrat pushing for tariffs ever.

[–] Plebcouncilman -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Sure the implementation is fucked. But the basis of it is not necessarily bad. And I believe that even botched implement would have resulted in long term gains that would have been beneficial.

Also economic experts are almost exclusively coming from a neoclassical vision, which is incomplete because it disregards the role of money. Modern Monetary Theory simply fixes that limitation and adds a new perspective that is more complete than the neoclassical vision.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gvDcMU_ko1h5TeVjQL8UMJW9gmKY1x0zcqKIRTZQDAQ/mobilebasic

When the experts of any given field are said that they are incorrect they tend to react with rejection, so it is no surprise that they would reject MMT, as it destroys a lot of what their work has been based on. So don’t just listen to what the experts say, they have incentives to reject revolutionary ideas in their field.

[–] Plebcouncilman 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You raise some excellent points. What’s your Substack so I can read more about your nuanced, well thought out out political takes?

[–] Plebcouncilman -1 points 1 day ago

Excellent rebuttal. Well thought out.

[–] Plebcouncilman -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

International laws are not real laws. Unless the countries are willing to bomb to oblivion a country that breaks international law, there’s nothing to enforce it and therefore they do not exist in practice. They only exists when the US says they exist because they are willing to bomb the country breaking the law.

[–] Plebcouncilman 4 points 1 day ago

Elon’s success as a businessman beyond being very good at self promotion is that he’s a brilliant cost cutter. SpaceX exists as it does today thanks to his exceptional ability to make people do great things with the least amount of resources and processes possible. The problem is at this point he has bought in too much into his own myth to the point he’s a caricature of his own self. Sensors are expensive and ugly, so he doesn’t want to use them and his argument is that humans don’t have sensors, only eyes. Which is a fine philosophy if you’re trying to create a system that is as dangerous as humans behind the wheel but I thought the idea was to make something better.

[–] Plebcouncilman 0 points 1 day ago

I reached the same conclusion. But at the end of the day it’s your system, if losing Gamepass doesn’t bother you go ahead and install SteamOS. I did see a few people say that it is somewhat buggy and that Bazzite is still better for the Ally.

[–] Plebcouncilman -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Yeah medicine is bitter. People can suffer now, or they can suffer later but the path we’re on will lead to suffering all the same. I prefer to suffer now frankly.

Edit: Let me get into this a little bit more, do you think the current economy is unfair to everyone except the elites? Your guttural reaction to this tells me that you might be, as most people on Lemmy. Well here’s the thing, changing the way things work, a revolution if you’d like to call it that but I don’t because it conjures images of a big uprising and I don’t think that’s necessarily how it’s gonna happen, will result in an upending of the system in such a way that it will be inevitable that people suffer. Change in human systems is followed or preceded by suffering. The possibility of suffering should not stop us from doing what will be best for future generations. I don’t understand where this mentality of avoiding suffering at all costs came from, but all it leads to is complacency and a continuation and proliferation of the current system. The worst thing is that the people that profess it the most tend to call themselves “leftists” which boggles my mind.

[–] Plebcouncilman -3 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The funniest thing is that wide sweeping tariffs are the most left coded action a president has taken since the establishment of social security. People really have lost all objectivity when it comes to Trump or his policies. The entire identity of the “left” in the US has become their opposition to him and his policies.

[–] Plebcouncilman 0 points 1 day ago

It’s been mostly on podcasts, mainly 1Dime radio which has been having MMT people for a while and I highly recommend. But I believe this blog post by Bill Mitchell, who is one of the main forces behind Modern Monetary Theory enters into the rationale of why he would think the tariffs have a solid foundation:

https://billmitchell.org/blog/?p=34677

view more: ‹ prev next ›