Yes it is, because "boomers," by definition of the word's intended memetic use, are old yes, but more specifically they are old rich people in power. Using "boomer" as an insult doesn't hurt them. Meanwhile the actual boomers are literally trying to stigmatize and criminalize queerness. It's the same logic that makes it ok (encouraged even) to be racist against white people, it just doesn't affect us.
PapaStevesy
joined 1 year ago
It doesn't count as self-awareness if he disassociates from the statement entirely, it's actually the opposite.
Something tells me it's a made-up scenario that affected literally no one.
Sorry, that was meant for someone else, lol.
"No" what? I didn't ask you any yes or no questions, I asked you to relate whatever the hell it is you're talking about to what I was talking about, which you have failed to do yet again. And you're a liar, you said you weren't gonna read this.
Don't forget sesquipedalian!
Yeah, that's their point.
What "slam" though? Why not just press the clutch down? I've driven manuals before and definitely didn't have to do any slamming of the pedals, it worked great.
Lol, you do realize you debunked your own claim by the end of the paragraph, right?
Lololol it started with my single point and then you changed the subject so you could...flex your in-depth chemistry knowledge on me I guess? But without actually making any salient point, so I'm left, as you say, yammering on to what is essentially a brick wall.
At least I gave one, even if it was sarcastic. Once again, all you offer is non sequiturs and haughty derision. I guess I just want to know what you think this discussion is about, because all I've gotten out of it is vacuous meta-argument trollery.
"Have you ever had a honk where you, if you, you would, you could, you would honk you so much you could honk anything?