Novi

How else does it remove undesirables. /s

I have, never fix this. It's a fidget spinner built in..

They mostly don't own anything. Either a rich person or a company owns where they live.

Set aside a few weekends and mess around distro hopping. Think of it as a small scientific study. Use what you determine to be the most comfortable.

I suggest being clever in your partitioning keeping /home and any other areas personal to their own partition if not their own disks. If you want to experiment you lose nothing by wiping / and installing something else. Also, you should decide on an effective backup strategy.

I would not vote guilty on your jury.

As good as it would feel to support this sentiment, every one of these "antivax idiots" that catches covid gives the virus more generations to mutate. Creating a danger to us all.

Incorrect, they agree they are people. They simply believe people can be owned. They are the descendants of people owners.

Audiobookshelf

He isn't a king and that is not his responsibility in the American government. Creating and passing law is the job of Congress. The president only has the last say on whether it goes.

Democrats are not "in power." It's been a split government since the second Obama term. Democrats do not have a majority in both houses of Congress.

Even when the democrats do control both houses, as with the first Obama administration, they do not force the issues. They operate on a "we don't stoop to that level" policy which is why liberal voter get upset with them.

If you wanted to go overboard, don't even make the server accessible publicly. Distribute keys to a Wireguard network that is accessible publicly. Mandate your players obtain keys from you to play.

Gotta make replacement laborers. If you put restrictions on that whose children will work in the meat packing plants?

Is not*

Edit:

It's a punitive system, not a rehabilitative system. Americans still believe that punishment is the only way to handle deviancy. Most believe the punishments are not hard enough, this is the "tough on crime" take conservatives have been running on for decades.

The point of interest is what happens when those extremists are accused of crimes. Suddenly, exceptions should be carved out for them.