No1RivenFucker

Is this specifically a reference to gate, or have we just accidentally come to the exact same end point independently?

You're not really wrong, I just would have rather done anything more enjoyable. Without getting into personal details, it was just the accidental resurgence of some bad blood with someone I was friends with years ago, solely just because we accidentally ended up in a matchmade game together.

The problem is that the article doesn't really have anything to say beyond the title of this post. Just a whole lot of padding and rambling to make an entire article out of a two line idea. It doesn't go into anything resembling what the premise would look like in the real world, nor does it build up reasoning for it beyond just "some people thought of this".

Overall, I've just been vibing, though I ended up blowing the vacation day I took on Friday basically just having an identity crisis and playing games. Guess I'll just check out the restaurant I had wanted to hit up next week. Glad I was able to get everything resolved before going back to work, but damn a wasted Friday always sucks.

Try filing a bug report to the admins of your instance as well. The api that feeds content to boost could have issues, even while the website front-end doesn't.

Looking back, I'm really glady middle and high schools made participation in extracurricular sports a requirement, even though I hated it at the time. Because even though I felt like the lazy slob compared to a lot of the people on other teams we played, once I got to college and beyond, especially considering I'm in a technical field, I realized that I was actually fairly athletic, relatively speaking, and had an inflated idea of what most people did.

Most modern social "science" papers are just "people I agree with are actually just superior people, and everyone I disagree with is stupid and dumb", with the most blatant statistics fuckery on earth

And I didn't plan on stopping eating those either

Seems like they use a lot of money for very little effect on this. I mean, 700k in government money and 60k/year budget, and they get less impressions on their content than my second favorite pokemon showdown YouTuber? Seems like they either have shitty content nobody actually cares to watch, or there's a lot of $$$ going into people's pockets at the top.

And looking at their content, it's obvious why. It's the most fucking corporate activist looking garbage ever. Like 90% of it just redirects back to their website, which nobody likes, regardless of who posts it. In addition they have a non-existent post schedule, with only two in 2023. Nobody on earth is going to organically discover and interact with their message in a meaningful way except for their own crowd of activists, who they don't need to reach in the first place. Overall, it just feels like out of touch activists who would rather keep their target audience at arms reach while sitting around talking up how great they are.

As a whole, they really need to shift to a much more human-first approach. While it's contradictory to say they need to try and be organic and in the community, it's ultimately what they would need to do to be successful. Because nobody just goes and looks for bland corporate content. There's a reason opera gx has significantly more impressions on ~~twitter~~ X than Google Chrome, despite the latter being a far more successful product.

Exactly. It's hilarious how you're getting downvoted solely just because you're not peddling the same partisan disinformation as everyone else