Mitchie151

Sounds like some dude came up with this 'second law of infodynamics' and then plucked out a bunch of examples that support his own law as if that somehow backed anything up at all. Didn't read the paper itself but the article doesn't do a very good job.

Seems 12ft doesn't work for this site

There's a lot out there for Arduino which is a great platform for learning. Arduino is a microcontroller you can use to read button inputs and control LEDs, all the way up to controlling robots and all sorts of things. It's pretty hands on compared to a lot of pure software stuff and is often sold in starter kits for kids learning. Worth looking into!

Yep, the manufacturers get massive tax breaks on this class of vehicle, which means they can make and sell them at the same or better price than a small, fuel efficient car. If a family with kids has to choose between a mid size crossover or an F150 at similar price points, why would you get the crossover? The USA needs to fix the way it taxes cars to disincentivise these fuel inefficient giant cars. No other country has these problems so it's not a selfish person problem, it's an entirely logical choice to make given the circumstances.

A huge chunk of it is because the USA has a huge tax incentive for car manufacturers to make bigger cars. When fuel efficiency standards started coming in, trucks were exempted because farmers needed their trucks for farm work, it's a loophole that encourages the manufacturers to build bigger vehicles to avoid these taxes. These massive vehicles are unusually cheap in the USA. If these loopholes regarding fuel efficiency were closed out people would be financially incentivised to buy smaller cars. Unfortunately, money talks. People aren't all selfish, they're just doing what makes sense for them.

The battery was disconnected from the car, I wonder if that's some naive attempt to preserve battery life while on holiday. Would have meant that the BMS couldn't do it's job.

I can't tell if you're being serious or not. I'd love to see you take it to anywhere!

I assumed you were being serious about it, and if you are, you need to do a lot more work to prove any of your theorems. It might make sense in your mind but a lot of the effort in academia is translating it to paper for others to understand. You can invent new conventions for your equations but they need to explain what is going on.

Wrapping "1/x = x/1" in a drawing of a Möbius strip doesn't make 1/x = x/1 unless you tell us what the Möbius strip means.

Most of your other posts look sane so idk what to make of this. To be honest, this is complete nonsense scribbled on a wall. Nothing you have written is mathematical at all. I'm not at all qualified to make any kind of judgement on this but my first thought was schizophrenia. You should consider seeing a doctor.

Meshmixer is good for exactly that but it's been a long time since I've used the software.

This is the most cursed headline I have read in some time. uncharted's Tom Holland? And using a picture from the lost frontier, ooft.

The value is implicit to the company, the shares don't create any new wealth. They convert equity in the company into cash. It's a way for the organisation to trade that equity for free cash. This is why companies with very high profits and thus cash flows buy back their shares.

When you buy shares you help move the market, driving the price of the shares up if there's demand. Obviously this makes it harder for the company to buy shares back which might be a bad thing if the company is truly a great, sustainable business, but it also means that whatever percentage of the company they do still control can be sold for more cash when it's needed.

There is a good reason to invest in sustainable companies. From a personally selfish perspective they typically perform very well, and from a more holistic perspective, as mentioned above trading shares raises their price and increases the value of the org.

From an organisations point of view, even entirely profit motivated companies that don't have a shred of humanity in their management are incentivised to behave sustainability and ethically in the current environment. The only companies that can really get away with being unsustainable are business to business companies and those whose products are incredibly inelastic, i.e. big oil. For everyone else, the loss of goodwill for behaving unethically and unsustainably can be too big. If you cut off a big enough chunk of your market your profits are going to be impacted. Plus all the other elements of sustainability, like treating your employees half well leads to improved employee and talent retention, more productivity, better community engagement, free advertising from all the goodwill etc.

Edit: there are also other risk factors for unsustainable management. Many more organisation are looking at their environment and their exposure to disasters. Fires are becoming a much bigger risk factor, and dangerous weather also poses a threat. For this reason some orgs now consider it prudent to go for net zero emissions for purely selfish reasons, not because it benefits everyone but because a better environment literally lowers their risk. Poor working conditions can also impact bottom line, especially if lawsuits line up. Overall, plenty of financial incentive for companies to behave sustainably these days.