Serious question - what rules in 5e encourage bad player behaviour?
Maimakterion
Not one person ever: "There is no song about Oath of Devotion Paladins"
Their site hasnt changed since it was hosted, they list "critical role" as an RPG system they support, they talk entirely in industry buzzwords. They're either a data harvesting scam or a tech startup that hopes someone will buy them before they waste too much effort putting together a product.
Oh hey, your scam got a product yet?
It's AI driven garbage.
Some techbro decided to 'disrupt' ttrpgs with new tech and is trying to make up a use case for it.
Oh nice, fake awards for ugly AI driven trash.
Might want to get someone with eyes to test your colour scheme on lads, keep adjusting it until the eyes at least stop bleeding.
... this list contains like 3 items phrased differently ~7 times each.
"This person had a family/friends" "This person was supporting someone else" "This person liked their pets"
repeat ...
I think the issue is that horny is the only option my dude.
The problem isnt 'i want vampires that are horny' but 'I want there to be only vampires that are horny'
It's not about someone getting what they want, it is about wanting other people not to get things you dont want.
Phyre doesnt sound much like vampire though?
I was halfway through a comment about how edgy it was for a vamp to have a 'fire' name
5 level 3+ characters vs 3 CR 1 bugbears and a handful of CR 1/4 goblins.
That is a trivial encounter. Of course you wrecked them.
... Dude, that's over a 20% chance of success. You sure you dont want to rethink this? it isnt even as improbable as some saves in normal play.