Lysergid

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Is it better than React functional components in any way? I don’t see benefit over React functional components or even Lit’s class components

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Library built this way because it supposed to be flexible and provide ground for complex usecases. It can only be flexible if your API works with simple abstractions which you can then compose. It’s not driven by “I need this specific utility for this specific scenario”. That would be zoo you have in JS where you have 10 ways to iterate over array and 9 of them wrong for your scenario.

Java’s OO is great because they design library with SRP in mind making sure there is few but good ways to do things.

BufferedReader cannot accept file name because it makes arbitrary reader… well buffered. It’s not BufferedFileReader, even that would accept something like Path or File, not string, because File can be remote file, should Reader now know all possible local and remote protocols and path formats? What else it must do?

Having it designed the way it is, allows Java to have utilities for various scenarios. Your scenario covered by standard lib too. See Files.readAllLines which, surprise-surprise, built on top of BufferedReader.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Char count is poor complexity metric. Perl is better than Python with your logic as it is more condensed.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Can anyone actually tell what exactly complicated in Java? Verbose, maybe it was at some point but I find it very straightforward and easy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t know german but it seems to be more logical to have one word for “health insurance card” since it describes one class of objects. Better than spelling 3 nouns where one partially describes what object is and other nouns act like clarification

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

No surprise he’s fine with make up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That was my first thought, but is that much different for say Tesla. They get tax breaks and pay as low as they can. Don’t get me wrong I not protecting China’s way, I’m rather against both. But it would be interesting to see numbers from both sides

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AFAIK major contributor into low Chinese EV prices are subsidies and tax breaks for manufacturers. I know they have significant tax breaks in US. It would be interesting to see how they compare. Because if they are mostly on par this is pure corporate greed stopping them. Especially in case of Tesla. They are not overpaying workers and don’t use luxury materials

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Though in reality, management will push back any unorthodox approaches/solutions/approaches as risk and additional losses on R&D.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

‘’’ Note: When I say “top-level” I am talking about the URL that you see in the address bar. So if you load fun-games.example in your URL bar and it makes a request to your-bank.example then fun-games.example is the top-level site. ‘’’ Meaning explicit creds won’t be sent. Even if fun-games knows how to send explicit creds, it can’t because fun-games does not have access to creds which stored for your-bank. Say suppose your-bank creds stored in local store. Since current URL is fun-games it can only access local storage of fun-games, not your-bank.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Thank you! I was always wondering why the heck this (mostly) useless and broken mechanism exists. I had hesitations about disabling it but had doubts about my understanding. Now I know I’m right

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

“Stateless” is not what “I” want, it is part of definition of REST.

Can do != what spec says you should do. You can also send clown version from the post but don’t be surprised people will find it… funny

Again, I’m not telling you are doing wrong. I’m telling you are mixing REST and RESTful web services

 
view more: next ›