I mean that’s the thing - it does happen, but those people are already being caught
And once they catch one, they catch a bunch of others that were part of the whatsapp/telegram/whatever group.
They don’t need these backdoors to catch them, because the ones caught like this are the stupid ones they will catch regardless.
Pretty sure the gpu BIOS is limited by default, nothing the OS can do about that.
Same for other parts like the cpu - core voltage is determined by the motherboard.
I doubt the os can just go “2V vcore” and blow up hardware.
The far left party in belgium is pro russian.
So far right are fascists, far left are tankies. Maybe one is worse than the other, but both are bad enough for that not to matter.
Don't forget they’re usually also agains cancel culture, which makes this even better.
According to the dutch news orgs, he made a “threatening gesture” towards a (female) camera operator, after he asked not to be filmed, repeatedly (there were not supposed to be cameras at that point, so the request was not unjustified). There was no physical contact.
That stuff sticks to (aka reacts with) literally nothing. That's the point of it. The whole innovation of nonstick cookware was the fact they got it to stick to something. It’s not even dangerous if you ingest it, it doesn’t react with anything so it just comes back out.
What IS dangerous is the by products and intermediate products, as well as the stuff that comes off if you overheat it. (And also, like you said, when they get old)
This whole movement against non-stick is alright, but so many people do it for the wrong reasons. If you have nonstick, just use it and don’t buy nonstick next time. Throwing away perfectly fine cookware like that is like boycotting charmin by flushing down all your remaining rolls in one go and going to the store to buy new toilet paper from another brand.
You really can’t use the bible against christians, unfortunately. With the millions of translations it went through, it is damn near illegible.
This passage is probably one of the worst, too.
They will just respond with “tHaTS NOt wHaT iT MeANs”, and you can’t really argue with that because it’s so poorly written.
I’m confused - does it explicitly ask you now?
I’ve had firefox as default for a while now
And the people hating on it somehow never used any version above 8, which is 10 years old and EOL.
Which is why we have HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, supported by all major browsers.
Unless you're doing something outrageously non-standard, there is no reason to block specific browsers.
The difference being that when you’re 10 billion into a renewables project, you usually have SOME generation already, whereas your nuclear reactor isn’t doing shit until it’s fully completed.
I don’t mind nuclear, but the fact is that the reactors take decades to build, whereas renewables can be deployed far quicker. Going all-in on nuclear, and then twiddling your thumbs for 10-15 years while the reactors are built doesn’t sound like a great idea.
Pretty much, yeah
I assume the equivalent would just be ‘takeown /r ’
As far as I can tell it always uses the currently logged in user as target though