LarsIsCool

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With this reasoning, would you say everything that a computer does makes sense, because it always follows the implementation? Or am I missing something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not oc, but thank you for explaining

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The circle one is my favorite piece!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What do you mean by europe/german language?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I couldn't when I was younger. Now I can, but not for more than 2 seconds

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

If we allow a bit more freedom in the wording, we also have the following:

"The letter after [K,O]"

"The letter before [L,P]"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But currently it is 2025, how do you explain that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

given / is a directory

Can it not be a directory? How?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

https://maps.app.goo.gl/hPQahGuQQpM8NUZv5 In case we wanted more information, here they were eating

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

To answer the question: The professor assumes the email referred to 1900-1910 with "late 1900s". As this was normal 20 years ago (and still gets used). He then gets upset realising the age difference between him and his student was likely the main contributor to this incorrect assumption.

To ask a question back: From https://www.bucknell.edu/fac-staff/john-penniman, I read:

John Penniman is Associate Professor and chair of Religious Studies

I would say for religious studies it should be fine. But also for other areas, why can't you use 1994 papers?

view more: next ›