LarsIsCool

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

In person timed tests suffer from people under performing because of external circumstances. Also we should consider chatgpt as a tool that can be used like a calculator. If the answer to a test can be easily retrieved for a widely available tool, the test is only measuring performance that is no longer required. Where possible, ideally measuring performance is based on their skill during a larger time period regardless of the tools they might use. For example repeated in-person peer review sessions (without a specific time slot) could both improve once performance and generating evidence of performance over time while reducing effort from the staff

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

This will break posts where the author intends to format the title in large letters

Even then I think this might be a good solution. This prevents users abusing this to get attention. I don't see a legitimate reason the receiver would like some titles to be larger than others

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I could do it in two clicks:

Click on this link https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore

Click uninstall

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The only way to learn, is by playing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Out of interest, what are you missing?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

So where is your battery percentage to judge?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Looking at the graph, it might be that it is inaccurate starting data combined with a slow decline

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That makes sense. It seems that the house owners have since expanded with a little shed next to their house

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Just wondering, how old is the picture?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

!https://maps.app.goo.gl/1ZKG9RR7AYRg4j7j7!<

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting, thank you for explaining!

view more: next ›