Which homes? The ones that are already in short supply? The ones that are currently being rented out? Would that mean nationalizing those buildings? Or are we building new homes? How are we paying for any of this? Raise taxes? Cut some other services?
None of this is simple when it comes down to the details on how to actually implement it.
I'm a Canadian who hates all temperatures above 60, and I'll tell you that humidity always matters. I had the luxury of traveling to Phoenix in July, and that was still more tolerable than anywhere that was 20 degrees cooler but 100% more humid. Heat isn't so bad when sweating still works.
It's somewhat less hereditary than it's used to be, but that's basically the only difference.
That's what I do with all TV/Movie adaptations. Is so much easier to just sit back and enjoy when you aren't constantly comparing it to something it's not.
All good ideas start off theoretical. These are just the details that need to be considered in order to turn a good concept into an actual functioning system.
How does that scale up to large communities where people aren't generally going to know each other on that level?
These chuckle fucks in the media are driving people to Bitcoin Milhouse
That's the point. The majority of our news media outlets lean that way.
Wait, so me saying that Teams is not that bad relatively speaking is a toxic mindset? You do see the irony of flying handle at me to say that, right?
Edit: Deleted duplicate
Everything is relative. Teams is a shining beacon of competency when compared to a lot of the utter shit software and firmware that I end up having to deal with.
My first response was: "I'd be willing to watch any video proof for or against that assumption." I think it may be time to re-evaluate my standards a bit.