Hi. I think you combined comments of two separate people as coming from one person. My understanding is that OP agrees that your reasonable perspective is valid and reasonable and will do it's best to be considerate about things like that it in the future.
Ideonek
It walks, sounds, smells and looks like a bullshit. I wonder what could it be?
'So where fans can find you know?' He asked, so she didn't hesitate to share links to her books and arts.
If this story allone doesn't terrify you to the bone something is seriously wrong with you.
People don't trust the economy that can be toss back-and-forth with a single tweet? What a puzzler.
I don't belive it did.
It don't. Mostly becouse it don't have to. Your online behavior is easier accessible and a better predictor... (pretty bad over-all, but still better. Digital Marketing Bubble is bursting!)
That's why I find idea that no gamer in Ready Player One tried running a car backward offensive.
Well, TBH I'm not 100% sure what scalping is in that context, but people made a lot of speculative buying without the accrual appreciation of the medium, and one day when they all tried to unpack it turned out it was worthless. When they stop buing, market was decimated.
That's very intersting. And a little worrying. Didn't behavior like that almost kill comic?
Thanks, without of your post I would be very likely to by mystery box. All great advices.
You seems to think the entire process is "our model is missing something, so we made up so shit it kind of works and call it a day".
In fact it's A) our model is missing something B) it would work, if X was true, so to check if it could be valid... (And this part is crucial) C) ...lets consider what else would be true if X was true. What else (from outside the model) can we measure? Would the result be different if X was true or flase? Let's make predictions and see, see how well we did.
It's not A) The car stopped. Car that wouldn't have gas would stop. Ergo we belive that car don't have gas.
It's B) car have stopped. Car that wouldn't have gas would have stop. If car don't have gas, we would expect it to be lighter than cars with gas and we would expect a driver to go out with cannister and move in the direction of gas-station... and we weight the car, and look for a driver moving on foot. Only, once our predictions are confirmed we update our model.
Is it 100% correct? No but it's a systemic and reasonable aproch of moving model closer to the truth.