I like to imagine that he was at one point providing good copper, but eventually, once he became so famous that people built statues, he stopped caring about quality and went full con man.
Grandwolf319
joined 2 years ago
So my trick is to only care when people actually do something instead of dead catting.
Threatens Canada? That’s not a thing, let me know when they put a bill.
Praises Bibi? We all know how they feel, not news, let me know when more funding has been approved.
Threatens tariffs? Okay let me know when they start taking effect, cause last time it was a bluff.
Kind of same thing here, AOC (whom I’m a big fan of) isn’t proposing a bill or asking for people to show up on a certain date to protest, not really news.
It works cause news organizations’ whole purpose is to report news, actual events, but they haven’t been doing their job cause they are chasing clicks.
Is that Johnny blank shirt?
I wonder who California would chose, I would have thought Canada but I’m not sure anymore
In this example a sugar is something that is sweet.
Another example is artificial flavours still being a flavour.
Or like artificial light being in fact light.
I am so happy this was the top comment, if it wasn’t, the disappointment would have been immense.
I hope Denis just keeps doing what he is good at, move over Waititi, I gots me a new fav director.
There is an alternative reality out there where LLMs were never marketed as AI and were marketed as random generator.
In that world, tech savvy people would embrace this tech instead of having to constantly educate people that it is in fact not intelligence.
If you think of LLMs as something with actual intelligence you're going to be very unimpressed
Artificial sugar is still sugar.
Artificial intelligence implies there is intelligence in some shape or form.
Because you're using it wrong.
No, I think you mean to say it’s because you’re using it for the wrong use case.
Well this tool has been marketed as if it would handle such use cases.
I don’t think I’ve actually seen any AI marketing that was honest about what it can do.
I personally think image recognition is the best use case as it pretty much does what it promises.
Yeah, I don't get why so many people seem to not get that.
The disconnect is that those people use their tools differently, they want to rely on the output, not use it as a starting point.
I’m one of those people, reviewing AI slop is much harder for me than just summarizing it myself.
I find function name suggestions useful cause it’s a lookup tool, it’s not the same as a summary tool that doesn’t help me find a needle in a haystack, it just finds me a needle when I have access to many needles already, I want the good/best needle, and it can’t do that.
Oh wow, their chickens don’t pop 6 at a time ehh.
/s