Filthmontane

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

None of those are socialist countries. They're all capitalist

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

Russia devolved into capitalism. Funding a military is incredibly expensive and necessary when a communist country wants to exist in a world with the United States. This creates a militant economy that must be centrally governed to coordinate this military might. True democratic socialism is impossible as long as the United States exists as an imperialist force.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Weird because China is succeeding quite well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

It only takes one toke to go over the line

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure Crimea wouldn't like that deal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

As the vice president of my local, I agree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Marx coined the term, sure. But he didn't come up with much more than that and a very rudimentary theory on how it would work. Lenin put it into practice and actually created it as an economic model. Everything else you're arguing is theoretical semantics. How the thing works is how the thing works.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's important to consider the conditions in which state ownership was deemed necessary. Countries with a starving and illiterate working class isn't as capable at a true worker owned economy as one that already has a well fed and educated working class. A true socialist society needs basic infrastructure and fulfillment of the basic needs of its people before it can be properly implemented.

Lenin's concept of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat was intended to be a temporary system intended on rapid development and growth of the economy. It was more important to try and stop starvation and establish railroads than build worker co-ops. The mistake was when the leaders that came after decided to never cede power back to the working class.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This made me realize two things about Harry Potter. 1: why do the wizards not simply use magic AND guns? 2: oculus repairo is a stupid fucking spell. You're telling me there's a specific spell just for repairing glasses? That's just bad writing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

So, obviously research this yourself and don't listen to some dumbass on the Internet. As I understand it, there's a difference between soluble fiber and insoluble fiber. Soluble fiber is good for your cholesterol and blood sugar. Insoluble fiber is good for digestion. It's very likely that any fiber gummies are gonna be soluble fiber. I take the metamucil capsules for insoluble and fiber gummies for soluble.

This has been my nerd rant.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That's pretty general though. I'm trying to pinpoint the issue as the show not properly nesting plot threads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not about who killed the night king, it's about when he died. If the opening scene of the show is about the white walkers coming and killing everyone, that should be the final scene of the show. Imagine return of the Jedi beginning with killing off Darth Vader, the main villain that the protagonists have been fighting against the entire time, and then the rest of the movie is Luke trying to defeat Jabba. Or if frodo got the ring to Mt Doom and then they still had to defeat saruman

They should have lost the battle in winterfell, retreated to kings landing, then had a final battle against the night King and cersei all in one major battle. It truly doesn't matter who kills the night King, just that he is the last antagonist to die since he was the first one to be introduced. It's about closing plot threads in the order that you open them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›