Eyeuhnluuung

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely think working 12 hrs 3 days a week is the key to happiness in life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Worth a double take for sure. I think it has more to do with the transition from young adulthood to being a grown woman, with access to one of the best athletic training programs in the world, and probably an image/style consultant with an eye towards parlaying the Olympics participation into a lucrative career.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 weeks ago

Kinda think OP has a point about the soap making.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More likely he’s using meth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I have to do prior auths sometimes. Always get this line which makes me think what the fuck am I doing this for?

“Prior authorization is not a guarantee of payment. All final payment is subject to the members eligibility and benefits at the time of service”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I wouldn’t be so certain.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No need to make the internet a worse place.

More Reddit-y here by the day…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not a gun owner myself, so curious, is your carry gun not always locked up when not on your person?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Except a pardon is a core function within the president’s constitutional authority, not just an official act, thus based on the opinion entitled to absolute immunity. The footnote exchange is only referencing official acts (which are entitled to presumptive immunity) not core constitutional functions (like a pardon).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have a different take and I think the Chief Justice is being intentionally vague here. He references a bribery prosecution but never specifically mentions in the footnote whether he is referring to the issuance of a pardon, which is a core function, and thus entitled to absolute immunity based on the rest of the opinion. It’s also not clear whether he is referring to a prosecution of the briber or the person being bribed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

(on standing)

2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Don’t want to get stuck at the hands of the Mountain. Any advice for building my defenses up?

view more: next ›