EvergreenGuru

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Israel has decided to kill the negotiators representing the Palestinians so that they can continue destroying Palestinian people and their homes. Netanyahu is holding onto power by extending the war and escalating the violence. The decision of the Israelis to elect him may lead to a regional war should the country begin fighting Iran.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If a state created by foreign Jews stealing and re-settling stolen land does not meet the definition of colonialism, then colonies do not exist.

The same can be said about the intentional bombing of civilians and wholesale slaughter of Palestinians during this war. If this is not genocide, then there is no such thing as genocide.

If we believe your lies, then we live in a world where actions cannot be described and words mean nothing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The reason Israel keeps getting attacked is because it’s a colony that seeks to create a regional empire. The reason they didn’t lose is because Egypt halted their forces instead of pushing for victory.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

No. The Palestinians have a land dispute because they’ve been ethnically cleansed from their land, bit by bit, by Israel over the last 70 years. They receive arms because their allies believe Palestinians shouldn’t be subjected to apartheid and genocide.

The most Iran gets from the situation is less refugees because the Palestinians will eventually succeed and get their land back. This would improve the stability of the region, as most countries in the Middle East agree that a country with a history of fighting wars to steal other peoples’ land (as Israel has done) is a threat to all other countries in the region.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Buddy, do I have news for you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Good for her. She was born a girl and those attacking her femininity should be called out.

 

When I was in university, one of the major questions of international economics was globalisation and its effects. At the time, debates on whether globalisation will bring about convergence or divergence remained inconclusive; will we be seeing cultures merging into homogeneity, or will we be celebrating plurality in aesthetics and philosophies. Ten years later, we finally have the answer.

view more: next ›