Das Land ist kaputt und zehntausende tot.
Ohne die militärischen Mittel wären es halt hunderttausende.
Etwas scheint dir das aber wert zu sein. Dass das ukrainische Volk sich seine Machthaber selbst aussuchen darf?
Das muss es doc wenn dann dem ukrainischen Volk wert sein, nicht uns. Ich scheine etwas verpasst zu haben. An welcher Stelle zwingen die Unterstützer die Ukrainer zum Kämpfen?
Autoproduktion in Deutschland geht an der Nachfrage und den finanziellen Möglichkeiten der Kunden vorbei.
Ftfy.
Ja, kommt, lasst mal VW retten, sonst müssen die noch weniger Dividende ausschütten. Die armen Investoren!
On the other hand, if it was 107°C outside, the outrage would be so much more justified.
I'm not gonna debate this here further. The fact that we obviously disagree proves my point.
Strohmann. Ich hab nichts davon als ok bezeichnet. Und selbst wenn ich das hätte, wär's immernoch whataboutism.
Now you're jumping from "deescalating conflicts" to isolationist goals. That's not the same thing. However it beautifully illustrates the point of my original comment. It's highly debatable if "isolationist goals" are a good thing he would be accused of.
(Actually) Deescalating conflicts would be a good thing, I think most would agree. He just won't be able to, because his idea of deescalating is submitting to dictators. His interest isn't solving anything, just blocking out the noise and taking credit.
Ich habe 2017 meine Heimatstadt verlassen und war seitdem bei keinem "Hausarzt". Mal sehen wann der Leidensdruck groß genug wird.
He gets accused of wanting to deescalate conflicts, pull out of NATO, and generally refusing to uphold the constant state of war that every single US politician wants.
Just going off e.g. the stunt he pulled with moving the embassy to Jerusalem, I would say this sentence is giving him way too much benefit of the doubt.
The way see it, what he is mostly accused of is claiming to want to do those things (and most candidates would claim they wanted to "solve" e.g. the middle east conflict) but not actually having any kind of realistic idea of how to achieve any of them. Possibly besides pulling out of NATO, which, given the current state of the world, is a stretch to call this a "good thing".
Also, when it comes to stupid pointless conflicts, I think we can rest assured that he will always be invested in them on the side he believes he can personally profit off the most. Which is an ideology too if you think about it.
Preposterous! Nobody has ever accused Donald Trump of doing a good thing.
Der Herr missversteht das Ausbleiben eines definitionsgemäßen "Krieges" als "Frieden". Wenn man danach geht, ist in Gaza auch grade Frieden.