DoPeopleLookHere

AFAIK fair use means you can redistribute.

I'm wrong about why,

But it's been ruled as fair use

Decompiling doesn't give you the code like you'd expect.

It gives you the instructions the code generates.

There's a Lego island decomp documentary on YouTube that is recomend for more details.

But the actual source code used doesn't get piped out. Instead you get the machine instructions and you make code that generates the same instructions.

Meaning your still writing the game yourself, meaning you own the copyright

It's more than fascists, but I do hold plenty of love for those willing to show love in my life.

"People" just don't however.

When the world decides to stop hating me for my existence.....

It's not focusing on one thing at a time, it's people having a limited number of fucks to give right now.

I'm a trans lesbian, and I really don't care when pride is celebrated. Because it's not really about pride anymore at all. It's all about corporate rainbow washing. So why would I care what month that happens in? I'd much rather deal with that problem than the month it's celebrated in.

That's not what Proffitt is.

My understanding is clauses that own work made outside of work (hours, resources, nonncompeteing scope, ect...) is not enforceable.

But if you do anything related to the company, then it's theirs.

Canadian software developer here,

It's really not. Contracts like that in Canada and US haven't been used widely in a long time.

So the first line of what you quite says you can't.

I'm a professional developer. If I learn and use it in my job, I'm in violation of the licese.

What I mean by value is the ability to learn and use it as you wish. Without worry of if your going against a license.

What's the point of source available if I'm never allowed to derive value from it?

I'm not confusing the two. If I copy the "source available" and accidently remember it in a "commercial" product, I'm technically hooped. It's considered derivative work and therefore I'm in violation of the license. Regardless if I'm a simple app dev or Google.

Also, like I said a few times now. I done own the code I contribute. Technically meaning if you contribute code, and use that snippet in a commercial context, again, your in violation of the license.

This is why copy left is the defacto standard. The author of the code retains copywrite ownership of it.

Your still resolving solved problems.