You intentionally posted some derived work that showed the actual interview in the background while some random guy told people what to think. Just post actual news.
DiggV4
joined 2 years ago
The actual article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/weapons-contractors-price-gouging-pentagon-60-minutes-transcript-2023-05-21/
No mention of Russia or $800 billion.
It's not even how you spell the guy's name.
Get better at propaganda.
Where's $15.7 billion coming from? Not this article.
According to Total Shape, world famous for its economic analysis work. /s
The money that they could have spent but didn't spend? Presumably they'll spend it on more Ukrainian aid.
βItβs the impromptu-ness of in-person β so for example, I was at the office and there was somebody from Chicago, she was in the San Francisco office β βOh do you have time to go and chat and have a meeting about a strategy that weβre rolling out?ββ
What they're really saying is that this person from Chicago doesn't understand how to plan or schedule.
Having extra money left over seems like the opposite of a grift to me.
She's wrong about that.
That isn't what you did, and you know it. It's someone else speaking over the video footage. Someone who couldn't even spell the interviewee's name right.