ConsistencyWelder

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The early reviews showed the 7800X3D a little faster than the 7950X3D, but the scheduling has been improved since then. The 7950X3D is faster for gaming in most cases now, because of the slightly higher turbo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Typo. They either meant to write Ryzen 7000 or Ryzen 9-series.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Has it been an entire week now without Intel selling off a failed part of their business?

Wait, guess it hasn't: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-kills-off-its-chip-freezing-cryo-cooling-technology

Intel needs properly good and inspiring leadership. Pat ain't it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's not fair, I'm sure it has its big fans as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I heard the super is gonna be better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is not even new. The 6950XT was faster than a 3090Ti in 1440p and below, but cost $1100 vs the 3090Ti's $2000.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like it's only limited to see if there's enough interest for it, they're not ruling out making more of them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And will be ruined by burn in faster too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The new, upgraded base model is $400 and comes with 256GB instead of 64GB as one of the improvements. I think that's a nice upgrade for most people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What are you basing that on?

The 7800XT in particular seems to be doing very well. At least in EU+US.

view more: ‹ prev next ›