CapitalismsRefugee

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe that's the point being made. "Representative Democracy", or at least the pretense of which some live under at this time, is the best we ("we" referring to a particular group of people, not humanity as a sum) have found so far.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Is this the case that was being watched because, as part of the settlement, the Sackler family was likely to be granted immunity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

...supposed to

Can you just sniff paint in your own home and stay away from reasonable people?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Holy crap! Did you hurt yourself whipping so fast to understand exactly the point?

Of course a broken person shouldn't be punished for being broken! Fuckin duh! dipshit

Should such a person be prevented from harming others? Absolutely.

Is the right move to lock this person away for 30 days of to lock them away for the rest of their life? No. Neither of these is an option even a four year old would expect to prevent this person and others in similar situations from performing similar crimes. I am confident, in fact, that even you could think of a better solution if you thought about it for about twelve seconds. Is that solution, or any solution, likely to be the perfect solution? Absolutely Not. A solution that's dog shit would be more effective than the one implemented here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Celsius or Fahrenheit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Frustrated is too small a word for the feeling of having a question that should have a readily available answer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I love my Thursday boots. I do a fair amount of standing and walking in them and wear them all the time and they've always been comfortable for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I read this article but didn't see, mind helping me get clarity?

What I read from the article is that the companies wouldn't give in to the unions' demands, Biden forced the unions to keep working but then kept pushing(?) for the demands of the unions'.

What powers does the president have to force / encourage the rail companies to adopt the demands of the unions? How did Biden keep pushing? What does pushing mean in this context?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Pretending the incident was random and unpredictable is your preferred way of preventing incidents like this from happening again?

Figure out what how and why the problem came to exist, that's kinda a big part of solving it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think I disagree with you, but with this comment you're kinda being an ass

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The former president covered the cost of the bond by putting 10% toward it and he worked with a local Atlanta bonding company Foster Bail Bonds LLC, sources told CNN.

view more: next ›