Audacious

joined 9 months ago
[–] Audacious 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are going to close it down, right?

[–] Audacious 1 points 1 month ago

He's the normal Texan there. Months ago, when he was covering people attacking workers fixing the downed power grid, he didn't realize how racist the news was being. Same thing with Mizkif. And they like Knut for the same reasons. I hope Knut and his family are forced back to Norway.

[–] Audacious -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn't know how I got back to ml lol I'm out

[–] Audacious -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not the other commenter but the meme infers USSR was better, and infers people knew what was to happen afterwards. Russia was making progress a little bit before Putin. I constantly think about what if I wasn't adopted. I'll probably be dead, forced to fight on the wrong side of war in Ukrainian. Then again idk what the USSR would be if it never fallen, completely blocking foreigners from adopting their orphans.

[–] Audacious 3 points 1 month ago

Have a wallpaper of this, never knew what it was until now.

[–] Audacious 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

All sides are using Bernie to bash Democrats, and I don't like it.

[–] Audacious 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everything seems lawless now.

[–] Audacious 3 points 2 months ago

I don't want to dox anyone or myself. Is this a google issue or did I link it wrong?

[–] Audacious 4 points 2 months ago

Assuming only red states have low population and grows faster is weird, but might be plausible. I could look into historical birth rates of each state, or population changes, comparing them to each other to see if the trends make sense. I assumed (or didn't think of) there wouldn't be bias growth rates based on state affiliation (red or blue). My first thought was gerrymandering and could it cause this bias. Either way, I didn't think about population growth having an inherent bias in this.

[–] Audacious 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was referencing that website, it kinda lines up around the time the parties switched. The party switch could be another result or part of the cause of that inflection point. I realized there could be connection when I was trying to figure out when the parties switched, but I don't know enough about that history.

[–] Audacious 9 points 2 months ago

I forgot to add: In determining if the state was red or blue at a change point, I looked at the 4 prior election results, and 2 aft election results, 6 total to determine how red, blue, or tied purple it was for that time. It's the only fudge factor that could be modified because it's just a guess, but I think the trend will remain even if you modify this (Ex: 3 prior, 1 aft, 2 prior, 1 Aft, etc.)

 

After noticing the electoral votes changed for this election from the last in 2020, I counted the change in differences of republican states and democratic states, ignoring the swing states. I noticed republican states gained more votes this time than last, and democratic states lost votes, overall giving republicans more electoral votes for this election. Then I kept on going all the way back to almost the civil war. To me, it seems the electoral college has been favoring red states from 1968 to present time. I want to post this somewhere to get feedback if there is a legit trend (red/right leaning) or I have missed something or anything else.

I tried to color the sheets so they are not too hard to read and understand. I also color coded conservative party as red, and liberal party as blue. There was a party shift between 1960 and 1980, probably having 1971 as the inflection point (WTF happened in 1971?). It was interesting to see some states stay mostly their colors from the remnants of the civil war to present day. You should be able to download the document, if you want.

Also, should I also send this to my representative or would that be pointless, or fruitless?

view more: next ›