AttyFireWood

joined 11 months ago
 

Will there a standard for the number of dimming zones on a MiniLED monitor? Or is it the "wild west" now and it's just going to continue to evolve faster than the industry can agree to a standard?

At first glance, I assumed that they would follow the aspect ratio of the monitor, eg there would be some multiple of 16x9 for these (144, 576, 1296, 2304). However, DisplayNinja lists 4 monitors with dimming zones between 336 and 384, 2 monitors with 500 zones, and 2 monitors with 512 zones. Then there's 21 monitors with 576 zones, which makes sense.

For 576 zones on a 27" monitor, each zone is about .5in2 or 3.2cm2. For a 32" monitor, that's .75in2 or 4.8cm2 per zone.

1152 also seems to be a popular number of zones, which is 5762, but that number does not maintain the aspect ratio, so are these zones not square? Two monitors have 1196 zones, which I'm not sure how they got that. No monitor has 1296 zones (4827). But, there are 6 with 2304 zones, which is 64*36, and does keep the 16:9 ratio. Will next year bring 3600 zone monitors? Will there be some sort of standard for each monitor size just like 24"/1080p, 27"/1440p, and 32"/4k has become a sort of standard?

It's also interesting to think about the number of pixels allocated to each zone (although there's probably overlap so to give a gradient instead of checkerboarding?).

Pixels per zone:

  • 1080p 576 zones: 3,600. 1296 zones: 1,600. 2304 zones: 900
  • 1440p 576 zones: 6,400. 1296 zones: 2,844. 2304 zones: 1,600
  • 2160p 576 zones: 14,400. 1296 zones: 6,400. 2304 zones: 3,600 They can keep cramming in more zones, but with diminishing returns. I wonder if costs will come down significantly as they go for more and more zones, so the cost of the panel won't scale with the number of zones. It has to be at OLED on cost and reliability.

Just thinking about these technical details and hoped others would like to chime in for a discussion. Thank you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Laser diode monitor when?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Even with all the same parts, the laptop has the laptop form factor, which means it's trades off cooling (peak/sustained performance) for mobility and cordless operation. A desktop with its large coolers will just have more mass and bigger fans - it's going to run cooler and quieter. It's just physics. At the same time, being able to fold up a laptop and bring it with you where you go is super convenient and obviously worth the trade off for many users. And we're at the point where performance required for most people is far exceeded by current CPUs (notwithstanding companies trying to keep costs as low as possible and trying to cut things down the the line of acceptability in a race to the bottom).

I'm interested in bigger picture conversations. Germanium has a lower melting point but is more conductive than Silicon. Would it make an ideal material for a mobile processor? Using less power while not having the expectation of pushing the limits of heat?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The 6th grade science teacher, Mrs. Parks, asked her class, "Which human body part increases up to ten times its size when stimulated?"

No one answered until little Mary stood up and said, "You should not be asking sixth graders a question like that! I'm going to tell my parents, and they will go and tell the principal, who will then fire you!"

Mrs. Parks ignored her and asked the question again, "Which body part increases to 10 times its size when stimulated?"

Little Mary's mouth fell open. Then she said to those around her, "Boy, is she going to get in big trouble!"

The teacher continued to ignore her and said to the class, "Anybody?"

Finally, Billy stood up, looked around nervously, and said, "The body part that increases 10 times its size when stimulated is the pupil of the eye."

Mrs. Parks said, "Very good, Billy," then turned to Mary and continued. "As for you, young lady, I have three things to say:

One, you have a dirty mind. Two, you didn't read your homework And three, one day you are going to be very, very disappointed."