AntiOutsideAktion

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In hindsight I wonder if it got pushed out as a response to the post-patriot act 'words that will get you put on a watchlist' copypasta fedposting illuminati

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You must be very slow witted to have your "I can't be racist because I'm Asian" argument dismissed so many times now and still drop it like it's a conversation stopper.

I don't care if it was created in a Wuhan lab. I care how it's deployed. And it doesn't get turned into the west's go to propaganda poster portrait without filling the role of yellow scare racism. It and your juvenile 'cee cee pee' shit has a clear purpose that you're just too much of a troll to speak plainly about.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Lol stupid black people upset about wide lipstick. It's just fucking lipstick and face paint. Hilarious I know.

I just came up with this rhetorical strategy of flattening the context of an offensive act so as to present it as being non offensive! I don't know where I got the idea but I sure do feel like I could win an online debate with it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

is-this they told me to read the actual post instead of believing what I want, is this gaslighting?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

Hi I'm full of shit and here's proof

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

You accuse us of childish behavior as you fling unfounded accusations of lying at us without any kind of follow up or justification.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

Seconded. This was one too many. They aren't even libs they're chuds.

 

Okay the first one of these I get it. But the most attention should be on those removed comments at the bottom of the list. So from the bottom:

What's the purpose of removing a comment asking @[email protected] what a 'momo' is and why it's 'time to die'? Doesn't that seem like a good fucking question? Why is a mod stepping in on this? If I were a moderator I sure would want to know what's up with that.

What rule is broken by saying their instance is bad? And in reply to a story about naked unashamed bigotry being allowed on it no less.

A smarmy little paragraph calling out someone for being toxic and whining about toxicity in return? Nary an expletive.

And just what the hell is wrong with the comment second from the top?

 

I got as far as them re-litigating Joe Lieberman

 
1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

 

@[email protected] https://hexbear.net/comment/3728216 wants the video of a Ukrainian nazi leader bragging about Zelenksy being great cover for them. I can think of a hundred times I shied away from making an argument I didn't have confidence I could find reference material for. We should have a 'first place to look'.

It would also be good SEO for our search function

 

a-little-trolling

 

Am I just getting a crummy brand? While the water has been heating up to a boil I've been trying to scoop off all the little bits that float but I never had to do that before and I don't even know if it's helping that much. Any tips from experience?

view more: next ›