There is zero chance it would be implemented in a way that would protect privacy.
Ajen
Right, because guns weren't used to settle disputes in America until very recent history. /s
Respectful, I disagree. I've learned a lot from people making small comments like that, even when they're unintentionally blunt.
Yeah, this is 100% self-preservation. The article says they are in favor of age verification but want it done at the device level which is a much larger threat to privacy.
Helpful by sharing information they believed to be true, that they thought you might not have heard/known. I don't see any malice in their post or any expectation that you change what you're doing.
I don't think that was meant as criticism, it seemed like they were trying to be helpful.
Awesome keeb, BTW!
What did you program your knobs to do? All of the above?
Leaving your job qualifies as a "life changing event" and allows you to sign up for private insurance under ACA. You don't need to wait for open enrollment.
You know, you can pay for private health insurance if you don't have a job. And if you have an emergency fund or (micro) retirement fund, it should include funds for health insurance.
Right? If it's in drinking water, why wouldn't it also be in beer?
GDPR is for commercial products, not government mandated ID.