AThing4String

joined 1 year ago
[–] AThing4String 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It may not be CSI quality, but it is FBI quality! Those EXACT tests and types of matches were how they identified the golden state killer and identify hundreds of John/Jane Does every year these days.

Turi King, who worked on the Richard III identification, has done very great and approachable lectures on those tests and how they're used in forensic genetics. Highly recommended watch BTW, and several are available on YouTube - she has one on just those tests and how they can be used as well as discussing their strengths and weaknesses with examples.

The "I'm 3.2% Native American" stuff is (mostly) BS, but if it's identifying specific matches, it's pretty strong evidence. It's not definitively HIM until they test him specifically, but it is the exact sort of thing that should put you on a suspect list and warrant him spitting in a cup, yeah.

The only way I could see it NOT being him is if he was using a close relative as the source, but I'm not sure why he wouldn't say that once challenged. Technically, that would have fulfilled the requirements of "anonymous" and "unknown to the mother" he promised.

[–] AThing4String 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There's a lot of "these allegations will be proven false in court" going on in this article.

My dude, there's DNA evidence. What allegations are there to disprove??

And why does it matter that it was before he worked at your clinic?? Like if someone had been found to be groping patients or stealing at their last identical job, there's no reason to be concerned they might have continued to do so while they worked for you?? No 'we'll look into this and be sure nothing untoward happened'??

"This was before he worked with us, and now we have safeguards in place, by which we mean we're aware he's a pervert and we watch him like a hawk, or whatever legal equivalent will absolve us of any wrongdoing for providing him with a target rich environment in exchange for the prestige."

[–] AThing4String 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also they were HORRIFICALLY unreliable, to the point where my mechanic's actual quote was "Folks, I'm not in the habit of talking myself out of a $10,000 paycheck, but this car is not worth it." 30 minutes before we walked in his door it was working fine, by the time he went to drive it to the bay it wouldn't start, and never did again.

It wasn't even paid off yet.

To say nothing of the fact that one had to drop the engine to get to the alternator, the electrical blew itself out twice in the 4 years we owned it, very few of the features worked with any competence, and we just got our 3rd or 4th safety recall for it (or whatever is left of the parts at the scrapyard).

Consumer Reports rated its reliability as a six - not out of ten, but out of ONE HUNDRED.

Absolute lemons.

[–] AThing4String 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

needing to ask people what 3rd party chat service they prefer

Yeah Signal's great and all, but my spouse's family refuses to use anything but WhatsApp, half my family uses FB Messenger while the other half use Discord (and they are feuding about it), the older folks in my hobby group refuse to learn anything but the default text on their phone (that group chat is an unmanageable NIGHTMARE), and anything from work uses teams.....except the US folks who use slack, and now my friends want to get me on Signal, too? Relevant XKCD.

The solution to my problem is not yet another messaging app. I just want ONE inbox!

I've been pretty happy with Beeper so far. There are some features that aren't quite as good as using each app natively, yet, but I think they're off to a great start considering the sheer scale and variety of interfaces they're working with. It even gives me tools to deal with the hobby chat anarchy, and now I can send default SMS messages from my computer!

[–] AThing4String 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah let's just salt the earth

[–] AThing4String 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember that - it was a few years back, I'll see if I can find the link.

BORU link with links to original

[–] AThing4String 17 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, forbidden snacks

[–] AThing4String 2 points 1 year ago

I know! That was the most disrespectful part!!

[–] AThing4String 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Many of your points are good, but 4 is pretty weak. I have left my personal laptop for 20 minutes to come back and find that the cat has put me into airplane mode, opened a hexadecimal calculator I didn't know I had, written a complain to Microsoft that only didn't send because of airplane mode (error popup and all), opened my family recipes, edited my family recipes to include actual text-symbol emojis among other garbage, and recorded the whole thing as a...... Gamer Clip???

She does this routinely.

I disable my work laptop keyboard before I even LOOK away from it, I don't want to find out how much damage she could push to production.

[–] AThing4String 13 points 1 year ago

To anyone reading the summary, this does not do it justice.

Read the article in full this time.

[–] AThing4String 5 points 1 year ago

Parent company doesn't want ANYONE to have direct read access to the database - only the scant few heavily formatted reports the user-facing software will allow. Data analysis still needs to get done though, so.....

Yeah. PQ -> Data Model saves my ass and my co-workers think I'm a wizard.

That, and learning how to quietly exploit minor vulnerabilities in the software to get raw tables I "shouldn't" have and telling not one soul has been a winning combo!

[–] AThing4String 10 points 1 year ago

This feels like a great time to mention that you can get potato chip flavouring powders for popcorn, so you can switch it up during the drawn out proceedings.

Otherwise I feel like that quantity of popcorn would wear out it's welcome.

view more: ‹ prev next ›