this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
75 points (77.8% liked)

Conservative

338 readers
154 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

To my knowledge, the concept of "conservatism" is the will to conserve, preserve past values that are seen as superior. While I don't agree with this either, this community has almost exclusively posts about fearing new things and trying to show them as evil. Evil migrants, evil new generations, evil new sexualities, whatever.

I do not see any "values" in it, only fear. Rejecting migrants is not based on morals or values that are rational, but on fear. Same for the rest. Which leads to the question, what is the point of this community? It does not lead to debate, people calling it out as fascism on one side (which is quite justified as the root ideas are seemingly identical) and the other side just saying that it's wrong and that's it. There's no debate of values, as there are no values to debate about.

I do not agree with the concept of conservatism, and I couldn't care less if this place is forever doomed to be downvoted in oblivion. But if you actually want to do something else than fear-mongering, even if you insist on talking about conservatism, then maybe it would be a good idea to refocus the community on actual ideas, and not the typical far-right speeches of hatred and fear that already flood a lot of media.

Of course I believe that it would be better to reconsider opinions that basically encourage the worst of humanity; but even aside from that, there is more to do than to replace every possibility of a conversation with the (stereo)typical "immigrants bad, jesus good, gays evil" speech.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (10 children)

What I find strange is that for a community that seems to be about discussing politics there is a huge absence of politics. I think the best way to explain is with a few examples. I'll post a few of the newest headlines from other political communities and we'll compare.

Canada Politics @ lemmy.ca:

  • Feds' water legislation needs to do better around Indigenous rights
  • Recall campaign launched to oust B.C. education minister over SOGI
  • Danielle Smith to invoke Sovereignty Act on Ottawa power rules next week, say sources
  • Trudeau government claims victory in latest trade dispute with U.S. over dairy
  • Feds want Toronto to do more in exchange for housing cash — the mayor says she's ready

Each one of these headlines mentions a politician or government agency and something they've done or said

Politics @ lemmy.world:

  • ‘I Will Come For You’: Court Filing Reveals Judge in Trump Case Received ‘Hundreds’ of Threats
  • Andrew Cuomo accused of sexual harassment in new lawsuit filed by former executive assistant Brittany Commisso
  • Republican Senate candidate’s family egg company caught in price-fixing plot
  • ‘Pipe down’: Biden allies step up calls for Dems to rally around president
  • Backlash to affirmative action hits pioneering maternal health program for Black women

The slant here is a lot more obvious with headlines being more sensationalized, however, except for the last one it's all about what politicians have said or done. The last one is about a conservative group suing to end a government program that provides charity to pregnant Black women which opens discussion about weather or not that program should exist.

Conservative @ lemm.ee:

  • One of America's fastest growing high school sports has 'no benchwarmers'
  • Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade in New York City
  • Migrants Take All Free Thanksgiving Turkeys Intended For Struggling New Yorkers
  • Poll: Gun ownership reaches record high with American electorate
  • USAToday Fact check: Yes, there's a vehicle 'kill switch' in Biden's 2021 infrastructure bill, and we lie about it.

Only the last article has anything to do with politicians or the government. The rest are just articles about guns, migrants, and protests. If the aim is for political discussion, articles should be about politics. I'm not sure what discussion can had with these kinds of articles, other than "that article is stupid" which is said more often with a downvote than a comment.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Only the last article has anything to do with politicians or the government.

And on top of that, that particular post misrepresented the actual article. So the conversation on that one was ~90% calling out the post for misrepresenting the article instead of the policy itself.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

with the (stereo)typical “immigrants bad, jesus good, gays evil” speech.

That middle part has all but vanished here. We can't have compassion for migrants because we have "limited resources" and clearly they're all just bad people (totally unrelated to their skin color they'll tell you). They gladly elect politicians that destroy the social safety net for the poor.

The only thing even remotely related to Jesus being here is supply side Jesus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (20 children)

Capital c Conservatism is about hierarchy. Hierarchies of race, gender, sexuality, or whatever. Any category imaginable must fit into an order with some on the top who rule over the masses at the bottom. Egalitarian ideals like democracy are disgusting to the Conservative, unless the franchise is exclusive to the "right" people.

God, guns, country, freedom, and capitalism are trends that come and go, but from Edmond Berk to Jordan Peterson, hierarchy is the throughline.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading the description of the values of the Republican party in the voter guide when I first could vote and thinking it made a lot of sense. Then I learned that instead of states rights, support of small business, and individual liberty it's all about pushing conformity at every level based on repressive ideology and taking over the federal mechanisms of power to enforce their will, I got a lot less interested.

At this point I have seen so many rabid, judgemental, hateful conservatives that I am convinced they need to burn the party to the ground and start from scratch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindbleach 2 points 9 months ago (12 children)

To my knowledge, the concept of “conservatism” is the will to conserve

That is not how any label has ever worked.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›