this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
318 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 132 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"we dont care about democracy. watch us circumvent it in every conceivable way possible" - ohio gop

just paraphrasing the article

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

"we dont care about democracy. watch us circumvent it in every conceivable way possible" - ohio gop

apparently inspired by Florida GOP

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They want Big Government off everyone's back, that is, unless they're the ones running it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, if they can get just enough of the Blahs (and maybe a few libz) into prison on nonsense things like a "drug war", then they can be sure to strip them of their vote, forever.

Freedom!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Coupled with draconian abortion laws, their end game is apparently fewer black voters and more white babies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Or maybe fewer female voters too

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

” we don’t care about democracy. watch is circumvent it in every conceivable way possible” - ohio gop

That should be the “entire gop” not just Ohio

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

You’re going to put TL;DRBot out of business…..

Gdism

[–] [email protected] 101 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Dear Ohioans,

If you voted to support abortion, and you're a Republican, then look at this and recognize that you're supporting a political party that does not enact the wills of the people.

Love,

A Lemming


And to others, I know, this won't reach them, but that's on them.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good thinking Ohio, voting on the weed bill the same day as the abortion bill! They're too distracted by fetuses to bother with the stoners!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I thought the GOP already came out and said they will put strict limits on the strength and availability of any THC product.

GOP: It might be legal, but you’re gonna pay through the nose for it, it’s going to be comparatively weak, so you have to buy a lot, but we’ll put a limit to the amount that can be purchased at any one time so you can’t even get therapeutic doses.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

They probably have businesses across state lines they've invested in, and want to keep traffic funnelling out of state.

[–] ricecake 2 points 9 months ago

It's like they're straight up saying fuck off to local businesses, and telling people to drive to Michigan.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So am I reading that right that the GOP wants to remove the checks and balances of the courts? Is this not a core tenant of our democracy?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They've been bemoaning the fact we have Democracy lately. They're playing up the Republic angle, and believe the People can't make the correct decisions for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago

and believe the People can't make the correct decisions for themselves.

Have you seen their supporters? They're right.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

They have been doing the "well, actually" thing for quite a while on the democracy aspect, but they have turned it up lately, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Without yet another amendment, how exactly does the Assembly, the legislative branch of Ohio’s government, intend to strip jurisdiction from the Ohio Supreme Court, the judicial branch of Ohio’s government?

The State’s Constitution establishes the jurisdiction for the high court and separation of powers prevent tampering.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They can't and won't. This is posturing, noise, and whining.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

And so it would be good to make note of each one of these posturing noise making whiners, and vote them out ASAP.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You assume the people that voted them in want them voted out...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

ah, thanks! I hadn't noticed my typo. You assume as well, I was urging those that voted for Issue 1. tata

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Ah, so Republicans' only tactic for "governing"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“The People have spoken” Republicans: “Fuck the People"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just don’t impregnate them

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

...and if you do, the wimmenz will be forced to bring to term their little miracles.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

They are eArThEn VeSsElS after all

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago

Republicans hate democracy. The GOP is anti-American.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Weird, courts are going to be implementing - or not - the actual procedure? I say doctors should just give a middle finger to these GOP "lawmakers".

But this is classic Republican horse manure. Will of the people? Fuck that. Must be "foreign election interference". Remember how they kept gaslighting over the "Russian hoax", even if Mueller's unredacted report does not claim it to be a hoax? Then, baby hands loses in 2020 and it must be Chavez' election machines rigging the election...projection, always projection.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

Alex Jones was claiming (without any evidence, like he always does) that because Kentucky re-elected our Democratic governor, that it proves there was election fraud. Like, hey you fucking dumbass, why would someone interfere to elect a Democrat as a governor and let every single other statewide office go to a Republican?

The GOP has completely lost the plot. Get ready for them to claim every election they lose as "stolen" or "rigged" for the rest of your life. Or (hopefully) the rest of their existence.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Two things:

  1. Absolutely double down on this loser position, please, until you're voted the fuck out.

  2. Good luck. While I haven't combed through the Ohio constitution, I hope the legislative branch can't just remove the judicial, whole or piecemeal. Checks and balances and all that. But if you pull it off at least we can stop pretending this is a functional democracy of any kind, and all we have to sacrifice is Ohio. Maybe it'll wake up a few people who still think there's a middle ground to be found with the GOP.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As an Ohioan, they will not be voted out. The state legislature has gerrymandered both houses to ensure a clear majority. This is why they throw tantrums like this. Their only worry is being primaried from the right. This is despite a constitutional amendment that was supposed to eliminate gerrymandering, but was really engineered by senate president Matt Huffman to be able to be ignored.

Ohio’s best bet is a new anti-gerrymandering amendment likely to be before voters that will completely remove politicians from the process.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ohio’s best bet is a new anti-gerrymandering amendment likely to be before voters that will completely remove politicians from the process.

I know this was recently cleared to start collecting signatures. Do you know where that's being coordinated or where I might be able to find places I can sign?

I'm proud to say I signed the issue 1 petition and voted for it. Would like to keep the momentum going and do the same with the redistricting proposal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I don’t know, but I’m sure there will be information soon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Came here to say #1. It's a loser position, so keep pushing it and see how well that works out in next year's election.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The problem is people will still do nothing about it so long as it doesn’t directly affect them.

Politicians have been insanely successful at making people not give a damn about others for a long time now. Unless the Federal democracy is attacked, I doubt people will do much elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

so long as it doesn't directly affect them

It's kind of insane how we're at the point where this would affect about 50.7% of the population or more, yet rhetoric towards oppressing this group is popular and competitive in the political sphere. What collective delusion do people need to have to think that "oh, If I, or my wife or my friends ever need an abortion, they'll treat it as a special circumstance/exception"???

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Because there is no collective social/class consciousness in America. It’s all zero-sum, win at all costs, second place is first loser. You can’t afford to care about the stranger but the idea of safety nets and socialist public policies is demonized constantly as either weakness or deliberate theft.

Everyone here would rather risk hurting themselves than helping someone else at their own expense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

There's also a possibility of a federal lawsuit under the Guarantee clause

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Several Ohio Republican lawmakers are proposing to strip courts of the authority to review cases related to implementing the newly passed Issue 1 abortion amendment.

In a statement released Thursday, four GOP lawmakers claimed without evidence that there was “foreign election interference” in the vote to pass Issue 1, and threatened to block the ability of courts to interpret the new constitutional amendment.

“To prevent mischief by pro-abortion courts, Ohio legislators will consider removing jurisdiction from the judiciary over this ambiguous ballot initiative,” the lawmakers said. “The Ohio legislature alone will consider what, if any, modifications to make to existing laws based on public hearings and input from legal experts on both sides.”

Issue 1 passed Tuesday with 57 percent of the vote. It creates a constitutional right to reproductive freedom in the state, which protects decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing a pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion up to the point of fetal viability.

It allows the state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability, which is generally between 22 and 24 weeks into pregnancy, except when necessary to protect the life or health of the mother.

But Republicans in the General Assembly have vowed to fight the measure.

“Issue 1 doesn’t repeal a single Ohio law, in fact, it doesn’t even mention one,” state Rep. Bill Dean said in Thursday’s statement. “The amendment’s language is dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.”

Ohio’s six-week abortion ban that was signed into law by Gov. Mike DeWine (R) in 2019 contains no exceptions for rape or incest. It is currently tied up in court but could have taken effect if Issue 1 failed.

In a separate statement, Senate President Matt Huffman (R) said the measure’s passage was “just the beginning of a revolving door of ballot campaigns to repeal or replace Issue 1.”

Issue 1 will take effect in December, but it won’t be implemented until courts apply the new constitutional standard to abortion-related lawsuits, most notably the one challenging the current ban.

The Republican-majority Ohio Supreme Court is the ultimate authority in reviewing laws to determine if they align with the state constitution.

“It is very important that we see the new constitution be upheld,” said Lauren Blauvelt, co-chair of Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights. “So all of us who have been continuing to fight litigation … will continue to work together to ensure that the restrictions and bans that are currently in place are no longer in place.”

On the other side, Ohio House Democrats announced Thursday a law to repeal various existing laws that directly or indirectly restrict abortion care in Ohio. But Republicans hold strong majorities in both chambers of the General Assembly, so passage is an uphill fight.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

On a side note these signs should not be legally allowed to have slogans and shit. It obfuscates the props.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Several Ohio Republican lawmakers are proposing to strip courts of the authority to review cases related to implementing the newly passed Issue 1 abortion amendment.

In a statement released Thursday, four GOP lawmakers claimed without evidence that there was “foreign election interference” in the vote to pass Issue 1, and threatened to block the ability of courts to interpret the new constitutional amendment.

It creates a constitutional right to reproductive freedom in the state, which protects decisions on contraception, fertility treatment, continuing a pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion up to the point of fetal viability.

“The amendment’s language is dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.”

In a separate statement, Senate President Matt Huffman (R) said the measure’s passage was “just the beginning of a revolving door of ballot campaigns to repeal or replace Issue 1.”

Issue 1 will take effect in December, but it won’t be implemented until courts apply the new constitutional standard to abortion-related lawsuits, most notably the one challenging the current ban.


The original article contains 467 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!