this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
64 points (79.1% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3213 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

Many of us do not trust Facebook and anything it is associated with or swallows up.

EDIT:

https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/05/adam-mosseri-says-metas-threads-app-wont-have-activitypub-support-at-launch/

"Instagram head Adam Mosseri said "

β€œβ€œSoon, you’ll be able to follow and interact with people on other fediverse platforms, such as Mastodon. They can also find people on Threads using full usernames, such as @[email protected].””

β€œWe’re committed to building support for ActivityPub, the protocol behind Mastodon, into this app. We weren’t able to finish it for launch given a number of complications that come along with a decentralized network, but it’s coming,” he said.

β€œIf you’re wondering why this matters, here’s a reason: you may one day end up leaving Threads, or, hopefully not, end up de-platformed. If that ever happens, you should be able to take your audience with you to another server. Being open can enable that.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To me it’s simple. If Zuck has a part in this, I will find somewhere else to go.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I came here specifically to avoid meta and reddit

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Same. If Meta isn't chased away, I'm leaving the Fediverse. Once I ripped the reddit bandaid off, my loyalty to any one site evaporated. I won't feel a thing if I need to find somewhere else to go.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this instance doesn't defederate from Threads, I'm sure plenty of others will. And you can always host your own and lose very little functionality. That's the entire point of the fediverse. Tying your view of the fediverse to one single instance is kind of missing the point.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My concern is the embrace, extend, extinguish method that will ruin the Fediverse regardless of the number of instances, as big tech giants are so adept at doing. I don't have an optimistic outlook here. Meta is here for a reason, and they aren't going to just go away now that their foot is in the door.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see how they can accomplish that though. They can't really bring any value other than lower barrier of entry to users. They're exposed to other instances and everyone can point out what they're giving up when they can literally lose nothing by switching to a different instance.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Everyone read one article on ebrace, extend and extinguish and now they're experts on the subject matter

For all I see is that the biggest threat Threads brings to us is that by federating with them you're going to receive a shit ton of facebook quality content

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, all that matters is doomscrolling and shitposts, and we can all get our fill of content without any corporate fuckers fucking this shit the fuck up.

Also, Fuck spez and fuck Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Save some fucking for Ajit Pai while we're at it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Gladly, thanks for the reminder.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yes. They have destroyed enough internet they shouldn't allowed to touch this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

federation with meta will bring nothing but evil into our niche little corner of the net and i am not for it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Please don't federate with Meta. You can guarantee they'll ruin all that is good about the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we don't defederate from the outset I'm just gonna join another instance that did. I didn't sign up for Lemmy because I wanted fucking twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Please defederate from Meta while it is to our advantage.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Don't federate with Meta, please

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

If I wanted to be on meta I'd make a meta account

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Please don't federate with the Zucc

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have lemmy.world admins said anything about this yet at all?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (16 children)

It's starting to look like the capacity for a user to independently defederate their content from specific platforms is in order. Even better would be the capacity to select what specific content is federated where when publishing.

I personally want nothing to do with Meta, but I'd prefer to have the choice rather than having it made for me by the admins.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Agreed. I am already blocking communities I don't care for all the time but sometimes it would be much easier to be able to just block their entire instance (because the whole instance circles around the same type of content). I won't be able to find one single instance the federated with just the right others for my taste so let me just filter myself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Blocking and defederation are not the same, just to note. If you block someone, I'm pretty sure they can still see your stuff. You just can't see them. Defederation would actually stop them from seeing your stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It's very simple. Facebook/meta bullshit on here and I am moving to -tildes.

Fuck corporations. I hope they all burn and I hope their creators and their born and unborn offspring get cancer and die.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why Tildes and not just another instance? Tildes is still headed by a single person

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In case Lemmy.world doesn't defederate, I need an instance recommendation. Preferably something active. Not lemmy.ml and beehaw.org, I'm not going back to those. Anyone got any ideas?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I have done a little bit of reading but I'm still not sure what the issue is. Is it that Threads will take over and defacto become the entire Fediverse? Because I think that would happen whether or not Mastoson/Lemmy instances choose to defederate. Is privacy the concern, and if so, wouldn't it only affect people using Threads?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

FB has proven time and again that they don't care to moderate their spaces, and they increase engagement by presenting the most toxic and angering things to you. Community groups in particular are absolutely hideous on there, full of people angry at the (insert minority group) walking down the street. I don't want that in my life again, and I don't want it infecting lemmy. If I did want to engage with that type of content, I'd make an account on Threads.

That said, I'm not out here making demands of our admin and moderators right now. They're busy just keeping this place running. The threads situation won't be going away tomorrow, so it can wait a hot minute.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because this is reminiscent of what happened with XMPP. In the old days you had many closed source protocols for instant messaging. Then XMPP came along and started gaining steam. At that point, major platforms started using it, with everything federated. Someone with Google could talk to someone on Facebook and with someone on myown.sillyserver.net. Everything was going great. But obviously the majority of people went with the easy option to go with Facebook or Google, meaning you still had a federated network on the paper, but with a few actors weighing way more than most.

Obviously at that point, they slowly defederated, preventing their customers from talking to their contacts on other platforms. But most of their contacts where on the same platform, so the cost of migrating was higher. That's how the federation ended. XMPP still exists, and was actually used by WhatsApp in a non federated way, but it is the shell of itself with not a lot of people using it.

A social network strength is in its number. Accepting Meta into Fediverse creates a very real risk that they will try an embrace and extinguish strategy and in the end you will have most people on Meta and just a niche of people on Lemmy/Mastodon, similar to how it was a few months ago.

The goal of the fediverse is to find the proper balance between having multiple platforms big enough so that moderation and technical management can be done by knowledgeable people, but small enough that they cannot decide willy nilly to defederated. Having Meta in the fediverse would very probably break that balance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's a combination of EEE (Engage, Enhance, Extinguish) tactics, as well as toxicity overload. Meta are notorious for manipulating their viewers. Threads will rapidly devolve into rage bait, since this gives maximum engagement. They will use us to dilute the resultant toxicity. Once it's established, even de-federating might not be enough. It could generate a locust like influx of toxic new members. The federation doesn't have the community robustness to absorb that sort of hit right now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

One concern would be:

  1. Say Lemmy/kbin grows organically to 1 million users.
  2. Threads federates, with 100 million users

Do you want these users flooding Lemmy? I don't want to be biased at the theoretical type of user on Threads, though if the right wingers/trolls/extremists migrate to Threads because they think it's "more open" then that may be an issue. If it's full of soccer moms posting pictures of their kids, or karens complaining about everything, that may be an issue.

Multiculturalism is great, I want to hear new ideas, though some areas are breeding grounds for lower-think, it seems. This probably sounds prejudiced or elitist.

I want to talk to the vanguard people who take the risk and are openminded and come to lemmy, not necessarily the "lemmings" who join facebook because they love facebook and don't want to, or can't, delve deeper into why facebook is one of the worst forces in media at the moment.

I am not prejudiced (I hope) against "regular people" and "soccer moms", though think that if 10 million soccer moms came here, the discussions may not be as... interesting, as they are.

Also, I don't know what lemmy instances will think about downloading masses of data from threads.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think this will be pretty manageable by finding and using communities that are well-run and have explicit rules and standards of behavior that are enforced. If a community is explicitly meant for serious conversations about, I dunno, music theory, that is enforceable, and if Suburban Subaru Sarah actually wants to join in on that, all the better, but pics of her kid's soccer game will belong in a different space, just as much as pics of some nerd's Warcraft raid do too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes please block them, I don't want Meta poisoning Lemmy. If I wanted to see facebook content I would have a facebook account, I don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

i really hope we keep conglomerate out of the fediverse... they will commercialize it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Threads has 60 million users in 1 day, the fediverse has 12 million over years of growth.

We'd be keeping ourselves out of Threads, not the other way around.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

They can keep their 60 million threads, most of that is complete trash anyway.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

I can’t even interact on lemmy.world with my mastodon.world account. Is it really worth worrying about Thread accounts being able to interact here?

I have a feeling Thread is never going to bother with ActivityPub anyway. I suspect the threat was only ever a hedge in case Thread wasn’t as wildly successful on launch as it turned out to be.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't want them commercializing the space. I feel as though we came here to get away from that. I fear an EEE tactic at worst, ads possibly showing in my feed at the least. But its not like we can't defederate after launch if it is terrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Honestly, I feel like u/ruud is gonna see these comments and keep Zuck out of things. He seems like he cares about what's going on up in here.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί