this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
719 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
4920 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In his remarks, not only does Johnson claim Roe “gave constitutional cover to the elective killing of unborn children,” but he rails against the imagined economic detriments of abortion, pushing his caucus’ outlandish claim that by depleting a hypothetical workforce, abortion has defunded social security: “Think about the implications of that on the economy. We’re all struggling here to cover the bases of social security and Medicare and Medicaid and all the rest,” Johnson says. “If we had all those able-bodied workers in the economy we wouldn’t be going upside down and toppling over like this... Roe was a terrible corruption.” Mind you, social security and health care have been gutted in the last several years by Republican lawmakers, not people who choose to end a pregnancy.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

This guy Johnson is a psychopath imo

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Citizens asked the Republicans about this and they said "shut up!” /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

i kinda get the feeling that this nutjob is payback for booting mccarthy and nixing jordan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Payback for who? The people who wanted this nutjob are the same folks who booted McCarthy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the shift on McCarthy was when he interrogated a soldier and an army lawyer called him the fuck out “at long last have you no sense of decency?”

Nixon was a bipartisan boot as well.

That said yeah this is revenge for them. Not from republicans but from their right flank. The contingent that wanted McCarthy to be able to torment anyone to stop communists and homosexuals. The contingent that swore to never let something like watergate result in a presidential resignation. The contingent that looked at Goldwater and thought that he wasn’t quite bigoted enough. They had a kid with the moral majority and are hell bent on making everyone’s life hell

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While there's no question that the far right wants to stick it to pretty much everyone else, in this case I'm not talking about Senator Joseph McCarthy, but rather Representative (and briefly Speaker) Kevin McCarthy.

If you're going to look to the past for the source for our troubles, or at least for a major moment when we lost the chance to actually get the US to live up to the ideals we claim to represent, I think you'd need to look at Andrew Johnson as the shitbag who enabled the traitorous pre-fascist scum to remain in power in the country.

The trouble started long before the US existed, but there was a moment, bought with tremendous amounts of blood and suffering, that could have led to actual freedom if Andrew Johnson had not become president.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Ah sorry seeing the name next to Nixon made me think Joe not Kevin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And I kinda wonder just how many backup christofascists the GOP has.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A lot. The past decade has been a “get in line or get out of the way” primarying purge. Add in the effects of project redmap and gerrymandering and yeah it’s bad

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's creepy that he looks so similar to Steven Colbert.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering everything about the Colbert Report was making fun of conservatives, I'd think it means Colbert knocked it out of the park.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Scarier still when you realize that Colbert's impersonation was so good he actually kept getting invited to Republican Dinners and Events because they didn't know it was satire.

He claims to this day he still gets people asking him to bring back the Colbert show because of a "Lack of conservative figures on liberal media."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›