this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
67 points (97.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5023 readers
400 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The West Antarctic Ice Sheet will continue to increase its rate of melting over the rest of the century, no matter how much we reduce fossil fuel use, according to British Antarctic Survey (BAS) research published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change. A substantial acceleration in ice melting likely cannot now be avoided, which implies that Antarctica’s contribution to sea level rise could increase rapidly over the coming decades.

Scientists ran simulations on the UK’s national supercomputer to investigate ocean-driven melting of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: how much is unavoidable and must be adapted to, and how much melting the international community still has control over through reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Taking into account climate variability like El Niño, they found no significant difference between mid-range emissions scenarios and the most ambitious targets of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Even under a best-case scenario of 1.5°C global temperature rise, melting will increase three times faster than during the 20th century.

The paper

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

I miss the days when projections only went to 2°. Now we’ve got 8°. We’re so fucked.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It wasn’t unavoidable. It just can’t be avoided now. Your title makes it sound like there is no way we could have prevented this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"increased" is used as a description, read as:

An increased melting is 'unavoidable' now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The ‘now’ you added would have been enough.

[–] oroboros 3 points 10 months ago

Yep, and we could stop making it worse, but we won't :(