this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
54 points (65.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6990 readers
2 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RatherBeMTB 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That graph is too old or has the wrong information. Apple is more than 2 trillion today and Bitcoin is about 500+ billion right now.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone knows data is not beautiful when you visualize scalars using area instead of length.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m pretty sure it’s by volume, which is even worse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like it. you can visualize sizes with 3 orders of magnitude between them without one being microscopic.

What makes this graph shitty, is that the spheres don't look very 3D.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I respectfully disagree. If you want to compare orders of magnitude, you should use a logarithmic scale.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah these are long-ago settled, 101-level, wikipedia-level data visualization principles.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wait like 3D volume? 😬 I was looking at it completely wrong

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

What a terrible visualization

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A graph of overlapping 3D-spheres? That’s new.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think they are even to scale either so the artwork is pointless

[–] Sethayy 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It could be volumetrically to scale, which to say at the least is disgusting for a 2D graph

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🤢 an invisible exponentially compressed y-axis

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get the feeling that having nearly all money in stock markets is not the best idea. I don't know why that would be the case, but it seems very pyramid scheme like.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, it's cool and normal. What could possibly go wrong? Should anything try to go wrong, the great invisible hand will stop it!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are these meant to be spheres? A 2D circle would do much better at getting the point across, or at least cubes. Spheres are quite difficult to judge the volume by eye

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Real estate isn't there... But all the money in the world is.

Help, my house is now worthless? 🙈

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are houses considered money though? They are where most of peoples net worth is, but perhaps it is too non-liquid to be considered actual money for this chart.

But what's silly is that most of Bill Gates money is in stock markets so why is that money separate? Unless it is not part of the total.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd say so. A lot of investments are in company stock that simply couldn't be sold legally or without tanking it. I'd say it's easier to sell your house for a profit than for them to sell significant amounts of those shares. Or even for them to trade them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's a good point. You could sell all the houses in the world to eachother without the total value of the houses going to zero.

However with the stock market there is no way to extract this 66.8 trillion. You could maybe sell 20 trillion and then it could be worthless.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like this doesn't really put anything into perspective except the specific things shown.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems like it was made to cater to crypto-bros. For or against, I can't say. But the repeated comparison to bitcoin is weird.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I mean I expected this to be on /c/bitcoin or something. If it was, I wouldn't have bothered commenting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proportions seem off. The Bill Gates sphere is not ~1000x smaller than the All Money sphere. Not even close.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bill gates sphere is about 30 pixel radius and the all money is 300 pixels. So there sphere is approximately exactly x1000 small for Bill Gates.

Volume is difficult to judge, especially when its a 2D representation of a 3D object.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Interesting. Thanks for counting the pixels.

Just eye-balling, it doesn't seem 10x larger in diameter.

But yeah, this isn't 'beautiful' data when the initial look is a 2D circle and not a 3D sphere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who or what has to cease existing to bring balance?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Stock markets.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

the monetary-market system

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

society. We need to start over from the stone age