this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
8 points (78.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5316 readers
294 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] throw4w4y5 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

saved you a long read - it’s “sustainable aviation fuel.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can produce that, in small quantities. Get rid of the need for fossil fuels for ground transport, and a big chunk of the corn and soy crops that are currently blended into gasoline and diesel respectively can be used as aviation fuel. It's not a bad way to do it.

corn

soy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While there are hungry people, we shouldn't be growing crops just to set fire to them

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the US produces a massive surplus of corn (questionable government subsidies), only a tiny portion “sweet corn” (not shown on upper graph) is ever meant for the table

the VAST majority of US corn is relatively inedible “feed corn” meant for agricultural feed lots (blue bars, “Feed and residual use”) and industrial chemical manufacturing – ethanol (orange bars, “Alcohol for fuel use”), and fertilizers, food additives, etc. (gray bars, “Other food, seed, and industrial use”)

EDIT: check out Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma (2006) to get an idea of how dependent US is on industrial corn

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bio fuels are definitely an issue in that regard (and if SAF becomes a thing it can rapidly spin out of control). However, so far the far bigger issue here is the meat industry. Go vegan, save lives, save rainforest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meat isn't that much bigger than biofuels at this point. In the US, there's something like equal split of corn consumption and 3:2 meat:bioful on soy.

Mind you, the biofuels don't kick out as much methane, so they've got a more limited climate impact.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

The airline industry is not to be trusted. We are stuck with them for now if we want air travel, but that does not mean we must believe their lies.